Market risk in carbon market: an empirical analysis of the EUA and sCER

Bao jun Tang*, Cheng Shen, Yi fan Zhao

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The paper uses a capital asset pricing model to analyze the market risk in the European Union Emission Trading System (EU ETS) and clean development mechanisms (CDM) and Zipf analysis technology to analyze the carbon price volatility in different expectations of returns in the two markets. The results show that the systematic risk of the EU ETS market is around 0.07 %, but the CDM market is clearly divided into two stages; the systematic risk of the futures contracts in the first stage (DEC09–DEC12) is less than the EU ETS market, but the systematic risk of the futures contracts that enter the market is greater than the EU ETS market and has a higher market sensitivity, although on the unsystematic risk. The CDM market is always greater than the EU ETS market. Abnormal returns in the two carbon markets are both lower than 0.02 %, but CDM is higher. The probability of price down is greater than that of price up. The carbon price is affected by market mechanisms and external factors (economic crisis and environmental policies) in the low expectations of returns. However, in the high expectations of returns, compared with the CDM market, the carbon price change in the EU ETS market is less stable and has higher risks.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)333-346
    Number of pages14
    JournalNatural Hazards
    Volume75
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 16 Dec 2015

    Keywords

    • Clean development mechanisms (CDM)
    • European Union Emission Trading System (EU ETS)
    • Expectations of returns
    • Systematic risk

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Market risk in carbon market: an empirical analysis of the EUA and sCER'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this