TY - GEN
T1 - PACE
T2 - 28th ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2022
AU - Zhang, Haibin
AU - Duan, Sisi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Owner/Author.
PY - 2022/11/7
Y1 - 2022/11/7
N2 - The classic asynchronous Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) framework of Ben-Or, Kemler, and Rabin (BKR) and its descendants rely on reliable broadcast (RBC) and asynchronous binary agreement (ABA). However, BKR does not allow all ABA instances to run in parallel, a well-known performance bottleneck. We propose PACE, a generic framework that removes the bottleneck, allowing fully parallelizable ABA instances. PACE is built on RBC and reproposable ABA (RABA). Different from the conventional ABA, RABA allows a replica to change its mind and vote twice. We show how to efficiently build RABA protocols from existing ABA protocols and a new ABA protocol that we introduce. We implement six new BFT protocols: three in the BKR framework, and three in the PACE framework. Via a deployment using 91 replicas on Amazon EC2 across five continents, we show that all PACE instantiations, in both failure-free and failure scenarios, significantly outperform their BKR counterparts, and prior BFT protocols such as BEAT and Dumbo, in terms of latency, throughput, latency vs. throughput, and scalability.
AB - The classic asynchronous Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) framework of Ben-Or, Kemler, and Rabin (BKR) and its descendants rely on reliable broadcast (RBC) and asynchronous binary agreement (ABA). However, BKR does not allow all ABA instances to run in parallel, a well-known performance bottleneck. We propose PACE, a generic framework that removes the bottleneck, allowing fully parallelizable ABA instances. PACE is built on RBC and reproposable ABA (RABA). Different from the conventional ABA, RABA allows a replica to change its mind and vote twice. We show how to efficiently build RABA protocols from existing ABA protocols and a new ABA protocol that we introduce. We implement six new BFT protocols: three in the BKR framework, and three in the PACE framework. Via a deployment using 91 replicas on Amazon EC2 across five continents, we show that all PACE instantiations, in both failure-free and failure scenarios, significantly outperform their BKR counterparts, and prior BFT protocols such as BEAT and Dumbo, in terms of latency, throughput, latency vs. throughput, and scalability.
KW - asynchronous bft
KW - binary agreement
KW - blockchain
KW - fault tolerance
KW - reproposable asynchronous binary agreement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139612935&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3548606.3559348
DO - 10.1145/3548606.3559348
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85139612935
T3 - Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security
SP - 3151
EP - 3164
BT - CCS 2022 - Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
Y2 - 7 November 2022 through 11 November 2022
ER -