TY - GEN
T1 - How Proficient Are Large Language Models in Formal Languages? An In-Depth Insight for Knowledge Base Question Answering
AU - Liu, Jinxin
AU - Cao, Shulin
AU - Shi, Jiaxin
AU - Zhang, Tingjian
AU - Nie, Lunyiu
AU - Hu, Linmei
AU - Hou, Lei
AU - Li, Juanzi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Association for Computational Linguistics.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) aims to answer natural language questions based on facts in knowledge bases. A typical approach to KBQA is semantic parsing, which translates a question into an executable logical form in a formal language. Recent works leverage the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) for logical form generation to improve performance. However, although it is validated that LLMs are capable of solving some KBQA problems, there has been little discussion on the differences in LLMs' proficiency in formal languages used in semantic parsing. In this work, we propose to evaluate the understanding and generation ability of LLMs to deal with differently structured logical forms by examining the inter-conversion of natural and formal language through in-context learning of LLMs. Extensive experiments with models of different sizes show that state-of-the-art LLMs can understand formal languages as well as humans, but generating correct logical forms given a few examples remains a challenge. Most importantly, our results also indicate that LLMs exhibit considerable sensitivity. In general, the formal language with a lower formalization level, i.e., the more similar it is to natural language, is more friendly to LLMs. Code and data can be found at https://github.com/Matthewlliu/structure_probe.
AB - Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) aims to answer natural language questions based on facts in knowledge bases. A typical approach to KBQA is semantic parsing, which translates a question into an executable logical form in a formal language. Recent works leverage the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) for logical form generation to improve performance. However, although it is validated that LLMs are capable of solving some KBQA problems, there has been little discussion on the differences in LLMs' proficiency in formal languages used in semantic parsing. In this work, we propose to evaluate the understanding and generation ability of LLMs to deal with differently structured logical forms by examining the inter-conversion of natural and formal language through in-context learning of LLMs. Extensive experiments with models of different sizes show that state-of-the-art LLMs can understand formal languages as well as humans, but generating correct logical forms given a few examples remains a challenge. Most importantly, our results also indicate that LLMs exhibit considerable sensitivity. In general, the formal language with a lower formalization level, i.e., the more similar it is to natural language, is more friendly to LLMs. Code and data can be found at https://github.com/Matthewlliu/structure_probe.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205317289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85205317289
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
SP - 792
EP - 815
BT - 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024 - Proceedings of the Conference
A2 - Ku, Lun-Wei
A2 - Martins, Andre
A2 - Srikumar, Vivek
PB - Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
T2 - Findings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024
Y2 - 11 August 2024 through 16 August 2024
ER -