Abstract
In response to cross-border cybercrime, investigative organs have adopted cross-border criminal forensic measures such as online public extraction, remote electronic data inspection and real-time monitoring, which may violate the principles of data sovereignty and judicial assistance. While promoting the establishment of a cross-border cooperation mechanism, China should establish a new cross-border electronic evidence criminal forensics model by promoting the procedural justification of cross-border search and monitoring measures. To better regulate cross-border criminal forensics activities, it is necessary to improve the cross-border cybercrime procuratorial organs system to intervene in advance and guide investigations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 21-44 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | International Journal of Evidence and Proof |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2024 |
Keywords
- cross-border cybercrimes
- cross-border electronic evidence
- cross-border forensics
- procuratorial organs `intervene in advance to guide investigations