TY - GEN
T1 - Snore sound recognition
T2 - 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2017
AU - Qian, Kun
AU - Janott, Christoph
AU - Deng, Jun
AU - Heiser, Clemens
AU - Hohenhorst, Winfried
AU - Herzog, Michael
AU - Cummins, Nicholas
AU - Schuller, Bjorn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 IEEE.
PY - 2017/9/13
Y1 - 2017/9/13
N2 - In this paper, we present a comprehensive comparison of wavelet features for the classification of snore sounds. Wavelet features have proven to be efficient in our previous work; however, the benefits of wavelet transform energy (WTE) and wavelet packet transform energy (WPTE) features were not clearly established. In this study, we firstly present our updated snore sounds database, expanded from 24 patients (collected by one medical centre) to 40 patients (collected by three medical centres). We then study the effects of varying frame sizes and overlaps for extraction of the wavelet low-level descriptors, the effect of which have yet to be fully established. We also compare the performance of the WTE and WPTE features when fed into multiple classifiers, namely, Support Vector Machines (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbours, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Random Forests, Extreme Learning Machines, Kernel Extreme Learning Machines, Multilayer Perceptron, and Deep Neural Networks. Key results presented indicate that, when fed into a SVM, WTE outperforms WPTE (one-tailed z-test, p<0.002). Further, WPTE can achieve a significant improvement when trained by a k-nearest neighbours classifier (one-tailed z-test, p < 0.001).
AB - In this paper, we present a comprehensive comparison of wavelet features for the classification of snore sounds. Wavelet features have proven to be efficient in our previous work; however, the benefits of wavelet transform energy (WTE) and wavelet packet transform energy (WPTE) features were not clearly established. In this study, we firstly present our updated snore sounds database, expanded from 24 patients (collected by one medical centre) to 40 patients (collected by three medical centres). We then study the effects of varying frame sizes and overlaps for extraction of the wavelet low-level descriptors, the effect of which have yet to be fully established. We also compare the performance of the WTE and WPTE features when fed into multiple classifiers, namely, Support Vector Machines (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbours, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Random Forests, Extreme Learning Machines, Kernel Extreme Learning Machines, Multilayer Perceptron, and Deep Neural Networks. Key results presented indicate that, when fed into a SVM, WTE outperforms WPTE (one-tailed z-test, p<0.002). Further, WPTE can achieve a significant improvement when trained by a k-nearest neighbours classifier (one-tailed z-test, p < 0.001).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032229316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037669
DO - 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037669
M3 - Conference contribution
C2 - 29060710
AN - SCOPUS:85032229316
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS
SP - 3737
EP - 3740
BT - 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 11 July 2017 through 15 July 2017
ER -