TY - JOUR
T1 - Distributional impacts of taxing carbon in China
T2 - Results from the CEEPA model
AU - Liang, Qiao Mei
AU - Wei, Yi Ming
PY - 2012/4
Y1 - 2012/4
N2 - This study aims to examine how mitigating CO2 through a carbon tax might affect the development goals of narrowing urban-rural gap and improving people's living standard. In this study, the China Energy and Environmental Policy Analysis (CEEPA) model, a recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium model, was employed to simulate taxing carbon in China. Different carbon tax schemes were designed and their impacts on household disposable income, household welfare, economic growth, and CO2 emissions were compared. Results show that, given the current social security system that obviously favors urban households and the current investment-driven economic growth pattern, without complementary measures for protecting households, a carbon tax will not only widen the urban-rural gap, but also reduce the living standards of both urban and rural households. The negative impacts caused by carbon tax will enlarge over time. An ideal solution, no matter under an emission intensity goal or a total amount control goal, is to reduce indirect tax with carbon tax revenue, whilst increase the share rural households obtain in government transfers.
AB - This study aims to examine how mitigating CO2 through a carbon tax might affect the development goals of narrowing urban-rural gap and improving people's living standard. In this study, the China Energy and Environmental Policy Analysis (CEEPA) model, a recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium model, was employed to simulate taxing carbon in China. Different carbon tax schemes were designed and their impacts on household disposable income, household welfare, economic growth, and CO2 emissions were compared. Results show that, given the current social security system that obviously favors urban households and the current investment-driven economic growth pattern, without complementary measures for protecting households, a carbon tax will not only widen the urban-rural gap, but also reduce the living standards of both urban and rural households. The negative impacts caused by carbon tax will enlarge over time. An ideal solution, no matter under an emission intensity goal or a total amount control goal, is to reduce indirect tax with carbon tax revenue, whilst increase the share rural households obtain in government transfers.
KW - Carbon tax
KW - Computable general equilibrium
KW - Income distribution
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84055200545&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.10.036
DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.10.036
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84055200545
SN - 0306-2619
VL - 92
SP - 545
EP - 551
JO - Applied Energy
JF - Applied Energy
ER -