TY - JOUR
T1 - Composite model predictive control for the boost converter and two-phase interleaved boost converter
AU - Samad, Muhammad Adnan
AU - Xia, Yuanqing
AU - Manzoor, Tayyab
AU - Mehmood, Kashif
AU - Saleem, Adeel
AU - Milyani, Ahmad H.
AU - Azhari, Abdullah Ahmed
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Samad, Xia, Manzoor, Mehmood, Saleem, Milyani and Azhari.
PY - 2023/1/16
Y1 - 2023/1/16
N2 - This article compares the conventional model predictive control (MPC) and active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) with a novel MPADRC technique for controlling a non-minimum phase behavior in the DC–DC boost converter. The control of the boost converter is challenging as it is nonlinear, and it shows non-minimum phase behavior in a continuous conduction mode (CCM). Moreover, in this article, the comparison is presented for the boost converter and the two-phase interleaved boost converter using MPC and ADRC, and the effectiveness of the interleaving technique is shown. Finally, it is proved that the interleaving method has much more efficiency and less output ripple than the simple boost converter. To conclude, a novel technique has been introduced that combines both the techniques, that is, MPC and ADRC, in the outer and inner loop with a boost converter, respectively, and the response is clearly the best when compared to the said techniques individually. The overall impact of this technique includes the advantages of both the techniques, that is, the use of MPC allows us to optimize the current value by predicting the future values, and the use of ADRC ensures that the disturbance factor is well tackled and cancels the effect caused by all the disturbances including ignored quantities as well.
AB - This article compares the conventional model predictive control (MPC) and active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) with a novel MPADRC technique for controlling a non-minimum phase behavior in the DC–DC boost converter. The control of the boost converter is challenging as it is nonlinear, and it shows non-minimum phase behavior in a continuous conduction mode (CCM). Moreover, in this article, the comparison is presented for the boost converter and the two-phase interleaved boost converter using MPC and ADRC, and the effectiveness of the interleaving technique is shown. Finally, it is proved that the interleaving method has much more efficiency and less output ripple than the simple boost converter. To conclude, a novel technique has been introduced that combines both the techniques, that is, MPC and ADRC, in the outer and inner loop with a boost converter, respectively, and the response is clearly the best when compared to the said techniques individually. The overall impact of this technique includes the advantages of both the techniques, that is, the use of MPC allows us to optimize the current value by predicting the future values, and the use of ADRC ensures that the disturbance factor is well tackled and cancels the effect caused by all the disturbances including ignored quantities as well.
KW - MPADRC
KW - active disturbance rejection control (ADRC)
KW - boost converter
KW - interleaved boost converter
KW - model predictive control (MPC)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147141566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fenrg.2022.1009812
DO - 10.3389/fenrg.2022.1009812
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85147141566
SN - 2296-598X
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in Energy Research
JF - Frontiers in Energy Research
M1 - 1009812
ER -