Barrier Analysis of the Two-Deadline Game

Ningsheng Xu, Weiwen Huang, Li Liang, Fang Deng*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

This paper presents an in-depth study on the dead-line differential game, which is a fundamental type within qualitative differential games. Challenges exist in the research, primarily due to the complexity of the Retrograde Path Equations (RPEs) in the two-deadline game, often preventing the determination of the barrier's analytical form. To address this problem, we introduce a novel method using decomposition. We decompose the entire game into two subgames, apply Isaacs's approach to construct the barriers for each subgame individually, and then obtain the complete barrier of the entire game. In the two-dimensional space, this paper discusses the variations in the barriers and capture regions as the distance between the pursuer's position and the positions of the two deadlines changes. We have validated the methods and conclusions through a series of examples, demonstrating their effectiveness. This research offers new insights into the theoretical study of deadline games, providing more strategic choices for decision-makers in practical applications.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 2023 China Automation Congress, CAC 2023
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages6872-6877
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9798350303759
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023
Event2023 China Automation Congress, CAC 2023 - Chongqing, China
Duration: 17 Nov 202319 Nov 2023

Publication series

NameProceedings - 2023 China Automation Congress, CAC 2023

Conference

Conference2023 China Automation Congress, CAC 2023
Country/TerritoryChina
CityChongqing
Period17/11/2319/11/23

Keywords

  • Barrier
  • deadline game
  • game of kind

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Barrier Analysis of the Two-Deadline Game'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this