A possible mechanism for the difference in ballistic performance between sapphire and spinel

Qiang Fu, Yangwei Wang*, Rui An, Zihan Xin, Xingwang Cheng, Jian Zhang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The contradictory finding that sapphire has advantages in most mechanical properties but is inferior to spinel in ballistic performance has been re-examined. The ballistic performance of sapphire and spinel against armor-piercing-incendiary (API) projectiles of caliber 7.62 mm was explored through experiments and numerical simulations. During the parameterization of the Johnson-Holmquist 2 (JH2) model, several assumptions concerning the material constants were suggested. The observed agreement between experiments and numerical simulations validated the simulation method. On this basis, a parametric study was carried out in which some of the JH2 parameters for sapphire were modified to those for spinel. The results showed that ceramics with lower tensile strength and lower Poisson's ratio tend to form a larger fracture cone, which contributes to higher ballistic resistance by spreading the load over a larger area. This work would offer new insight into the complex relationship between mechanical properties and ballistic performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6234-6246
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of the European Ceramic Society
Volume43
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Keywords

  • Ballistic performance
  • Johnson-Holmquist 2 model
  • Sapphire
  • Spinel
  • Transparent armor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A possible mechanism for the difference in ballistic performance between sapphire and spinel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this