A comparative study on reservoir energy efficiencies between two crude oil recovery technologies by air injection

Qiang Hui Xu, Cheng Zan, De Sheng Ma, Lin Shi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Reservoir energy efficiencies during crude oil recovery were comparatively studied between in situ combustion (ISC) and moderate temperature intelligent catalytic oxidation (MICO). Fuel consumptions were evaluated by local energy balance of reaction zones, and energy loss was obtained by numerically studying dimensionless thermal conduction problems with variable boundary conditions. Combined with recovery-volume burned method, oil production and energy utilization could be evaluated in an inverted five-spot reservoir. Narrow energy to oil production ratios (EOR) were studied respectively. The results showed the EOR of MICO is 42%~47% less than that of ISC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1164-1169
Number of pages6
JournalKung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics
Volume36
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Energy efficiency
  • Heat loss
  • In-situ combustion
  • Moderate temperature intelligent catalytic oxidation
  • Recoveryvolume burned method

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study on reservoir energy efficiencies between two crude oil recovery technologies by air injection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Xu, Q. H., Zan, C., Ma, D. S., & Shi, L. (2015). A comparative study on reservoir energy efficiencies between two crude oil recovery technologies by air injection. Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 36(6), 1164-1169.