标准不确定度A类评定中极差法的深入讨论

Translated title of the contribution: The Further Discussion of the Range Method in the Type A Evaluation of Sstandard Uncertainty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the differences between the JJF 1059.1-2012《Evaluation and Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement》 and the GUM is the introduction of the range method in the type A evaluation of standard uncertainty.Under the assumption of normal distribution and uniform distribution,the range statistic and the range coefficient can be derived from the distribution density function of the sample range.Analysis reveals that although the range estimation of the population standard deviation is unbiased, the range estimation of the population variance is biased larger.As the result,the combined standard uncertainty of the measurement result is biased larger.On the other hand, JJF1059.1 only lists the range coefficients for normal distribution,they cannot be applied in all circumstances.As a comparison,whatever the population distribution, the estimation of the population variance based on the Bessel formula is always unbiased, thus will not bring theoretical error into the calculation of the combined standard uncertainty of the measurement result.Since the range method suffering with the principle error in mathematical statistics and the restriction on applicability, it should be prudently used in the type A evaluation of standard uncertainty.

Translated title of the contributionThe Further Discussion of the Range Method in the Type A Evaluation of Sstandard Uncertainty
Original languageChinese (Traditional)
Pages (from-to)347-352
Number of pages6
JournalJiliang Xuebao/Acta Metrologica Sinica
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Further Discussion of the Range Method in the Type A Evaluation of Sstandard Uncertainty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Chen, L. F. (2019). 标准不确定度A类评定中极差法的深入讨论. Jiliang Xuebao/Acta Metrologica Sinica, 40(2), 347-352. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2019.02.29