TY - GEN
T1 - Comparison of Reconstruction Methods for Optical Projection Tomography with Sparse Angle Projections
AU - Chen, Hantang
AU - Ma, Xu
AU - Wang, Jihui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 SPIE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Optical projection tomography (OPT) is a three-dimensional (3D) imaging technique for biological samples, capable of visualizing tissues, embryos, and organs within 1mm to 10 mm scale. Filtered back projection (FBP) is an extensively used 3D reconstruction algorithm for OPT with dense sampling data from all view angles. In-vivo OPT can reduce the inspection time by using equally-spaced sparse angle projections to mitigate the side effects of phototoxicity and anesthetics. This work compares the reconstruction results of the sparse-angle OPT using different algorithms, including the FBP algorithm and two kinds of compressive sensing (CS) algorithms with different projection numbers. We also build up a testbed of OPT to verify these algorithms using experimental data. It shows that the CS algorithms result in reconstructed images with fewer artifacts compared to the FBP algorithm. Especially, the advantage of CS algorithms over FBP algorithm becomes more obvious as the projection number is reduced.
AB - Optical projection tomography (OPT) is a three-dimensional (3D) imaging technique for biological samples, capable of visualizing tissues, embryos, and organs within 1mm to 10 mm scale. Filtered back projection (FBP) is an extensively used 3D reconstruction algorithm for OPT with dense sampling data from all view angles. In-vivo OPT can reduce the inspection time by using equally-spaced sparse angle projections to mitigate the side effects of phototoxicity and anesthetics. This work compares the reconstruction results of the sparse-angle OPT using different algorithms, including the FBP algorithm and two kinds of compressive sensing (CS) algorithms with different projection numbers. We also build up a testbed of OPT to verify these algorithms using experimental data. It shows that the CS algorithms result in reconstructed images with fewer artifacts compared to the FBP algorithm. Especially, the advantage of CS algorithms over FBP algorithm becomes more obvious as the projection number is reduced.
KW - compressive sensing
KW - filtered back projection
KW - inverse reconstruction
KW - Optical projection tomography
KW - sparse angle projections
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200508379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1117/12.3031592
DO - 10.1117/12.3031592
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85200508379
T3 - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
BT - International Conference on Optics and Machine Vision, ICOMV 2024
A2 - Liu, Jinping
A2 - Subramaniyam, Kannimuthu
PB - SPIE
T2 - 3rd International Conference on Optics and Machine Vision, ICOMV 2024
Y2 - 19 January 2024 through 21 January 2024
ER -