Analysis and insights of the second-generation ternary AMP-PZ-MEA solvents for post-combustion carbon capture: Absorption-regeneration performance

This work comprehensively investigates absorption and regeneration performance of the second-generation AMP-PZ-MEA in comparison with the first-generation AMP-PZ-MEA, the benchmark 5 M MEA, and the conventional MEA at the same amine concentration. The performance indicators include CO₂ absorption capacity, mass transfer coefficient, CO₂ removal percentage, amount of desorbed CO₂, initial CO₂ desorption rate, and regeneration heat duty. Both 6 M (i.e., 2:2.5:1.5, 1.3:3.2:1.5, and 0.95:3.55:1.5) and 7 M (i.e., 2:2.5:2.5, 1.3:3.2:2.5, and 0.95:3.55:2.5) second-generation blends show more promising overall absorption and regeneration performance than 5 M, 6 M, and 7 M MEA. In comparison with the first-generation blend, 6 M and 7 M second-generation blends deliver more favorable mass transfer rate. Interestingly, an increase of PZ:AMP molar ratio accelerates mass transfer and absorption capacity but unfavorably affects solvent regeneration. Also, high viscosity of the second-generation 7 M blend (especially, at its equilibrium CO₂ loading) retards the solvent regeneration. The key success for a formulation of AMP-PZ-MEA is appropriate PZ:AMP molar ratio and total amine concentration. Too high and too low PZ:AMP molar ratio lead to (i) solvent precipitation and (ii) imbalance of absorption and regeneration performance. Three standouts are recommended. 2.5:0.5:3 is attractive due to its low regeneration heat duty (42.1% lower than that of 5 M MEA). In terms of mass transfer coefficient, 0.95:3.55:1.5 shows 148.6% higher than 5 M MEA. 2:2.5:1.5 is also favorable according its high mass transfer coefficient (91.3% greater respecting 5 M MEA) and low regeneration heat duty (16.3% less than 5 M MEA).