Comparative study on activation of aluminum with four liquid metals to generate hydrogen in alkaline solution

Si Cong Tan, Han Gui, Xiao Hu Yang, Bin Yuan, Shi Hui Zhan, Jing Liu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on a latest finding on Al-water reaction, we studied the hydrogen production behaviors activated by gallium based liquid metal where the mass percentage of Al was less than 1% in an alkaline environment. Three kinds of room temperature liquid binary alloy including Ga–In, Ga–Sn and Ga–Zn were tested and compared with pure gallium. It was shown that the hydrogen production rate activated by Ga–In alloy was far below than that of pure gallium, while Ga–Sn and Ga–Zn run slightly slower. Aiming to optimize the catalytic performance of pure gallium, we further performed researches to clarify its practical features. We divided five times to add equivalent Al block into pure gallium and found that the rate and quantity of hydrogen production kept unchanged in each batch addition, which suggested that liquid metal as catalyst was activated continuously without impurities mixing to impede catalytic effect. In addition, components analysis of the residual precipitates after reaction with XRD also indicated that there was only Al(OH)3 but no gallium or its derivatives. These findings as clarified by this article can help guide future high performance hydrogen generation and reuse of the liquid metal catalyst.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22663-22667
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Volume41
Issue number48
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Dec 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Al-water reaction
  • Aluminum activation
  • Gallium catalyst
  • Hydrogen generation
  • Liquid metal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative study on activation of aluminum with four liquid metals to generate hydrogen in alkaline solution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this