CFD modelling of small scale ORC scroll expanders using variable wall thicknesses

Simon Emhardt, Guohong Tian*, Panpan Song, John Chew, Mingshan Wei

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The built-in volume ratio of variable wall thickness scroll expanders can be increased without increasing the number of scroll turns and the expander size in contrast to constant wall thickness expanders. CFD models for these novel scroll-type designs are presented in this research paper. The validation, verification and the findings had proven consistency with the theory of small scale ORC scroll expanders. The performance analysis indicates that the optimum performance point was reached at a pressure ratio of 3.5. The decrease of radial clearance from 200 μm to 75 μm had a significant effect on the isentropic efficiency and the specific power output, with the isentropic efficiency significantly increasing from 31.9% up to 53.9%. Based on the second-law analysis, it is found that exergy of 336.5W (75 μm) and 864.2W (200 μm) were destroyed during the expansion processes. Furthermore, characteristic pressure imbalances were observed in the expansion chambers. The studies also reveal that the large-scale vortices, generated during the suction process, were completely dissipated in the expansion chambers at a crank angle of 600°. Analysis of the pressure-volume diagram shows that variable wall thickness scroll expanders with built-in volume ratios above 4.5 could fully expand the working fluid to the defined outlet pressure.

Original languageEnglish
Article number117399
JournalEnergy
Volume199
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2020

Keywords

  • Energy dissipation
  • ORC system
  • Pressure trace analysis
  • Scroll expander
  • Unsteady 3D CFD concept
  • Variable wall thickness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CFD modelling of small scale ORC scroll expanders using variable wall thicknesses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this