TY - GEN
T1 - Thermal analysis of coal gasification in supercritical water for power generation
AU - Chen, Zhewen
AU - Zhang, Xiaosong
AU - Gao, Lin
AU - Li, Sheng
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The ways of utilizing coal for power generation are directly combusting in air integrating with a steam cycle and gasification with O2/air integrating with a combined cycle. Special equipment is needed for the removal of NOx, SOx, CO2, PM2.5 and the cost is high. The technology of supercritical water gasification (SCWG) can efficiently convert coal to clean gaseous product. A novel method integrating SCWG with combined cycle for power generation is proposed. Two models, which mainly differ in heat recovery unit, are proposed, theoretically analyzed, and compared. The influence of coal-water-slurry concentration (CWSC) on the efficiencies of the models and their difference is investigated. The efficiencies of the models are increased with increasing CWSC. Implementing chemical heat recovery can raise the model efficiency by about 5.1% when the CWSC is 11.3%. The model with chemical heat recovery has an advantage over the model without chemical heat recovery in high CWSC but such an advantage is absent at low CWSC (the critical data is about 3.8%).
AB - The ways of utilizing coal for power generation are directly combusting in air integrating with a steam cycle and gasification with O2/air integrating with a combined cycle. Special equipment is needed for the removal of NOx, SOx, CO2, PM2.5 and the cost is high. The technology of supercritical water gasification (SCWG) can efficiently convert coal to clean gaseous product. A novel method integrating SCWG with combined cycle for power generation is proposed. Two models, which mainly differ in heat recovery unit, are proposed, theoretically analyzed, and compared. The influence of coal-water-slurry concentration (CWSC) on the efficiencies of the models and their difference is investigated. The efficiencies of the models are increased with increasing CWSC. Implementing chemical heat recovery can raise the model efficiency by about 5.1% when the CWSC is 11.3%. The model with chemical heat recovery has an advantage over the model without chemical heat recovery in high CWSC but such an advantage is absent at low CWSC (the critical data is about 3.8%).
KW - Combined cycle
KW - Power generation
KW - Supercritical water gasification
KW - Thermal analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978794703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84978794703
T3 - ECOS 2015 - 28th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems
BT - ECOS 2015 - 28th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems
PB - International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems
T2 - 28th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems, ECOS 2015
Y2 - 29 June 2015 through 3 July 2015
ER -