TY - GEN
T1 - Temporal-spatial scale effect on actual evapotranspiration in a semi-arid basin
AU - Yingying, Fang
AU - Youjing, Zhang
AU - Wenzhong, Wang
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - This paper developed an approach of the accuracy assessment in multi temporal-spatial scales. The SEBAL model and Thornthwaite water balance model were employed to calculate the daily ETa on three spatial scales. Then, three time scales ETa were expanded. Of them, the units were delineated by hydrological response unit (HRU). The calculating results of two models were compared on different scales. The results were that with the increase of temporal scale, the slopes of regression curves between unit results from two methods were 0.555, 0.667 and 0.813, with related coefficients of 0.714, 0.809 and 0.762. The ET difference decreased with the increase of spatial scale. On a monthly scale, the average of relative errors was over 30% at point scale, 10.3% and 1.59% at unit and basin scale, with RMSE of 8.32%, 9.51% and 0.43%. The better accuracy could be achieved at the larger scales because of the uncertainty decreasing. Experimental results indicated that temporal uncertainty is a key issue which needs further study, and the remote sensing method at the unit scale is beneficial to the water resources assessment and ET management in a changing regional environment.
AB - This paper developed an approach of the accuracy assessment in multi temporal-spatial scales. The SEBAL model and Thornthwaite water balance model were employed to calculate the daily ETa on three spatial scales. Then, three time scales ETa were expanded. Of them, the units were delineated by hydrological response unit (HRU). The calculating results of two models were compared on different scales. The results were that with the increase of temporal scale, the slopes of regression curves between unit results from two methods were 0.555, 0.667 and 0.813, with related coefficients of 0.714, 0.809 and 0.762. The ET difference decreased with the increase of spatial scale. On a monthly scale, the average of relative errors was over 30% at point scale, 10.3% and 1.59% at unit and basin scale, with RMSE of 8.32%, 9.51% and 0.43%. The better accuracy could be achieved at the larger scales because of the uncertainty decreasing. Experimental results indicated that temporal uncertainty is a key issue which needs further study, and the remote sensing method at the unit scale is beneficial to the water resources assessment and ET management in a changing regional environment.
KW - Evapotranspiration
KW - Heterogeneity
KW - SEBAL model
KW - Spatial scale
KW - Temporal scale
KW - Thornthwaite water balance model
KW - Uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861179938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84861179938
SN - 9781907161254
T3 - IAHS-AISH Publication
SP - 67
EP - 73
BT - Hydrological Cycle and Water Resources Sustainability in Changing Environments
T2 - 5th International Symposium on Integrated Water Resources Management, IWRM 2010 and the 3rd International Symposium on Methodology in Hydrology
Y2 - 19 November 2010 through 21 November 2010
ER -