TY - JOUR
T1 - Technology driven alliance for environmental and social responsibility in power supply chains
AU - Wu, Huamin
AU - Li, Guo
AU - Xiao, Shuang
AU - Li, Haifeng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/12/10
Y1 - 2020/12/10
N2 - Motivated by the practical application of information and communication technologies (ICT)-based innovations in environmental and social responsibility (ESR) investment, this study investigates a sustainable power supply chain that consists of a traditional energy power generation firm (TEF), a renewable energy power generation firm (REF) and a downstream power distributor (PD). Each supply chain member can invest in ESR to achieve energy conservation and emission reduction, and thereby gain economic benefits. To achieve higher power level for better ESR investment, the TEF may actively form an alliance with the REF or the PD, or not, which leads to three different alliance strategies, i.e., Strategy HA, Strategy VA, and Strategy NA, respectively. The results show that NA is the equilibrium strategy when the TEF's investment cost is low while the PD's investment cost is medium. However, when the TEF's investment cost is medium while the PD's investment cost is low, VA is the equilibrium strategy. Moreover, when the investment cost of the TEF and the REF are both low, HA is the equilibrium strategy. In the other cost intervals, the three power firms will not invest in ESR simultaneously, and consequently the alliance strategy has no effect on the revenue allocation. Therefore, the TEF forms no alliance with either the REF or the PD. By comparison with the unaligned case, we find that alliance not only benefits the TEF, but also the other firms in the power supply chain as well as the whole society resulting from the improved ESR investment, which achieves a “win-win-win” situation.
AB - Motivated by the practical application of information and communication technologies (ICT)-based innovations in environmental and social responsibility (ESR) investment, this study investigates a sustainable power supply chain that consists of a traditional energy power generation firm (TEF), a renewable energy power generation firm (REF) and a downstream power distributor (PD). Each supply chain member can invest in ESR to achieve energy conservation and emission reduction, and thereby gain economic benefits. To achieve higher power level for better ESR investment, the TEF may actively form an alliance with the REF or the PD, or not, which leads to three different alliance strategies, i.e., Strategy HA, Strategy VA, and Strategy NA, respectively. The results show that NA is the equilibrium strategy when the TEF's investment cost is low while the PD's investment cost is medium. However, when the TEF's investment cost is medium while the PD's investment cost is low, VA is the equilibrium strategy. Moreover, when the investment cost of the TEF and the REF are both low, HA is the equilibrium strategy. In the other cost intervals, the three power firms will not invest in ESR simultaneously, and consequently the alliance strategy has no effect on the revenue allocation. Therefore, the TEF forms no alliance with either the REF or the PD. By comparison with the unaligned case, we find that alliance not only benefits the TEF, but also the other firms in the power supply chain as well as the whole society resulting from the improved ESR investment, which achieves a “win-win-win” situation.
KW - Alliance
KW - Environmental and social responsibility
KW - Power supply chain
KW - Shapley value
KW - Synergy effect
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089159888&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123194
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123194
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089159888
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 276
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 123194
ER -