TY - JOUR
T1 - First-line treatment of severe aplastic anemia
T2 - immunosuppressive therapy plus eltrombopag versus haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, a multicenter prospective study
AU - Liu, Limin
AU - Han, Bing
AU - Zhang, Yanming
AU - Lei, Meiqing
AU - Liu, Rongrong
AU - Lin, Zenghua
AU - Jiao, Wenjing
AU - Zhang, Fengkui
AU - Fu, Rong
AU - Zhao, Xin
AU - Miao, Miao
AU - Zhang, Liansheng
AU - Wu, Depei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Matched-related donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the preferred first-line option for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients aged <40 years even in the era of eltrombopag (EPAG). However, there has not been any direct comparison between immunosuppressive therapy (IST) plus EPAG (IST + EPAG) and haploidentical HSCT (Haplo-HSCT) as first-line therapy. This study prospectively compared the efficacy, safety and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of Haplo-HSCT (n = 147) and IST + EPAG (n = 121) as first-line treatment for patients with SAA. The results showed that 86.3% of patients in the Haplo-HSCT group and 24.1% of patients in the IST + EPAG group achieved normal complete blood count (CBC) (P < 0.001) after 6 months of treatment. The time to achieve transfusion independence and absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.0 × 109/L were shorter in the Haplo-HSCT group than in the IST + EPAG group (P < 0.05). In the IST + EPAG and Haplo-HSCT, 3-year overall survival (OS) was 92.4 ± 2.4% and 82.8 ± 3.1% (P = 0.017), whereas 3-year failure-free survival (FFS) was 69.4 ± 4.2% and 81.6 ± 3.2% (P = 0.002), respectively. Similar results were observed in patients with <40 years of age. Among patients with ≥40 years of age, there was no difference in 3-year OS (88.6 ± 4.8% vs. 82.4 ± 8.1%, P = 0.517) between the IST + EPAG and Haplo-HSCT groups, whereas 3-year FFS was lower in the IST + EPAG (58.7 ± 7.5% vs. 82.4 ± 8.1%, P = 0.043). Subgroup analysis for populations aged <40 years indicated that SAA benefited more from IST + EPAG, and very SAA (vSAA) benefited more from Haplo-HSCT. Patients treated with haplo-HSCT scored significantly better in the HRQoL than treated with IST + EPAG (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that first-line Haplo-HSCT was associated with normal CBC at 6 months, better FFS and led to a better HRQoL (P < 0.001). In summary, the IST + EPAG achieved better OS for <40 years SAA patients, while the Haplo-HSCT accelerated hematopoietic recovery and HRQoL, achieved better FFS even for those <40 years vSAA and ≥40 years patients.
AB - Matched-related donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the preferred first-line option for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients aged <40 years even in the era of eltrombopag (EPAG). However, there has not been any direct comparison between immunosuppressive therapy (IST) plus EPAG (IST + EPAG) and haploidentical HSCT (Haplo-HSCT) as first-line therapy. This study prospectively compared the efficacy, safety and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of Haplo-HSCT (n = 147) and IST + EPAG (n = 121) as first-line treatment for patients with SAA. The results showed that 86.3% of patients in the Haplo-HSCT group and 24.1% of patients in the IST + EPAG group achieved normal complete blood count (CBC) (P < 0.001) after 6 months of treatment. The time to achieve transfusion independence and absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.0 × 109/L were shorter in the Haplo-HSCT group than in the IST + EPAG group (P < 0.05). In the IST + EPAG and Haplo-HSCT, 3-year overall survival (OS) was 92.4 ± 2.4% and 82.8 ± 3.1% (P = 0.017), whereas 3-year failure-free survival (FFS) was 69.4 ± 4.2% and 81.6 ± 3.2% (P = 0.002), respectively. Similar results were observed in patients with <40 years of age. Among patients with ≥40 years of age, there was no difference in 3-year OS (88.6 ± 4.8% vs. 82.4 ± 8.1%, P = 0.517) between the IST + EPAG and Haplo-HSCT groups, whereas 3-year FFS was lower in the IST + EPAG (58.7 ± 7.5% vs. 82.4 ± 8.1%, P = 0.043). Subgroup analysis for populations aged <40 years indicated that SAA benefited more from IST + EPAG, and very SAA (vSAA) benefited more from Haplo-HSCT. Patients treated with haplo-HSCT scored significantly better in the HRQoL than treated with IST + EPAG (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that first-line Haplo-HSCT was associated with normal CBC at 6 months, better FFS and led to a better HRQoL (P < 0.001). In summary, the IST + EPAG achieved better OS for <40 years SAA patients, while the Haplo-HSCT accelerated hematopoietic recovery and HRQoL, achieved better FFS even for those <40 years vSAA and ≥40 years patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200131471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41409-024-02377-1
DO - 10.1038/s41409-024-02377-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85200131471
SN - 0268-3369
JO - Bone Marrow Transplantation
JF - Bone Marrow Transplantation
ER -
