TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of hydrogen direct injection strategies and ignition timing on hydrogen diffusion, energy distributions and NOx emissions from an opposed rotary piston engine
AU - Gao, Jianbing
AU - Wang, Xiaochen
AU - Tian, Guohong
AU - Song, Panpan
AU - Ma, Chaochen
AU - Huang, Liyong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/12/15
Y1 - 2021/12/15
N2 - Opposed rotary piston (ORP) engines as a new type of internal combustion engines are free of connecting-rod mechanisms, have small engine size and mass. ORP engines have the abilities of delivering high power density. Hydrogen fuel applications in internal combustion engines contribute to nearly zero carbon emissions in the combustion processes. In this paper, the effect of hydrogen direct injection strategies and ignition timing on hydrogen diffusion, in-cylinder combustion, energy distributions, and nitric oxide (NOx) emissions are investigated using a numerical simulation method regarding this novel internal combustion engine. The results showed that hydrogen was the most unevenly distributed in the combustion chambers for the start of injection (SoI) of −68.2° crank angle (CA) after top dead centre (aTDC) among the three hydrogen injection strategies; meantime, it presented the lowest combustion efficiency, being smaller than 98.5%. The peak in-cylinder pressure ranged from 40 bar to 83 bar for the given scenarios. The combustion durations were in the range of 20 °CA ~ 30 °CA for the ignition timing of −20.85 °CA aTDC ~ −11.06 °CA aTDC. The indicated thermal efficiency was higher than 38% over early ignition cases; the energy losses in total fuel energy by cylinder walls were lower than 15%. NOx emissions factors were lower than 36 g/kWh, and they were reduced by the retarded hydrogen injection. The engine performance and NOx emissions under early hydrogen injection scenarios are less sensitive to late ignition; additionally, the crank angle corresponding to the optimal efficiency was almost the same under different hydrogen injection strategies.
AB - Opposed rotary piston (ORP) engines as a new type of internal combustion engines are free of connecting-rod mechanisms, have small engine size and mass. ORP engines have the abilities of delivering high power density. Hydrogen fuel applications in internal combustion engines contribute to nearly zero carbon emissions in the combustion processes. In this paper, the effect of hydrogen direct injection strategies and ignition timing on hydrogen diffusion, in-cylinder combustion, energy distributions, and nitric oxide (NOx) emissions are investigated using a numerical simulation method regarding this novel internal combustion engine. The results showed that hydrogen was the most unevenly distributed in the combustion chambers for the start of injection (SoI) of −68.2° crank angle (CA) after top dead centre (aTDC) among the three hydrogen injection strategies; meantime, it presented the lowest combustion efficiency, being smaller than 98.5%. The peak in-cylinder pressure ranged from 40 bar to 83 bar for the given scenarios. The combustion durations were in the range of 20 °CA ~ 30 °CA for the ignition timing of −20.85 °CA aTDC ~ −11.06 °CA aTDC. The indicated thermal efficiency was higher than 38% over early ignition cases; the energy losses in total fuel energy by cylinder walls were lower than 15%. NOx emissions factors were lower than 36 g/kWh, and they were reduced by the retarded hydrogen injection. The engine performance and NOx emissions under early hydrogen injection scenarios are less sensitive to late ignition; additionally, the crank angle corresponding to the optimal efficiency was almost the same under different hydrogen injection strategies.
KW - Combustion characteristics
KW - Energy distributions
KW - Hydrogen injection strategies
KW - Ignition timing
KW - NO formations
KW - Opposed rotary piston engines
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112687037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121656
DO - 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121656
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85112687037
SN - 0016-2361
VL - 306
JO - Fuel
JF - Fuel
M1 - 121656
ER -