TY - JOUR
T1 - Dot-dash grain boundary α
T2 - A new strategy for improving impact toughness of dual-phase Ti-652 alloy
AU - Sun, Yanan
AU - Hao, Pengfei
AU - Pan, Shiwei
AU - Feng, Ke
AU - Xu, Shun
AU - Yang, Lin
AU - Fan, Qunbo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/2/25
Y1 - 2025/2/25
N2 - Conventionally, continuous grain boundary α (GBα) was regarded as a detrimental microstructure for the mechanical properties of dual-phase titanium alloys, therefore, attention has been paid to break off or even eliminate GBα. In this work, Widmannstätten microstructure (LA) with continuous GBα, duplex microstructure (DP) without GBα and hierarchical microstructure (HR) with dot-dash grain boundary α (αGB-d) were prepared by a fine tuning of the heat treatments. Impressively, HR with αGB-d possesses a highest impact toughness, which is 56.3 % and 11.1 % higher than those of LA and DP, respectively. To elucidate the fracture mechanisms of αGB-d, energy controlled Charpy impact tests were carried out by adjusting the impact angle of hammer head, which provides direct evidence of the microstructure evolution during impact deformation. It was found that αGB-d played two main roles during impact deformation: as a weak micro-zone, αGB-d is prone to accumulate deformations and becomes the preferred site for crack initiation, in this case, αGB-d acts as structural element to absorb impact energy; on the other hand, the misorientation between αGB-d and adjacent αp hinders dislocation slip transfer and shortens crack propagation path. Thus, comparing with DP and LA, cracks propagating in HR absorb more energy and lead to less catastrophic fracture. This work develops the understanding of grain boundary α, and the findings are expected to provide new design guidance for the mechanical property improvement of titanium alloys.
AB - Conventionally, continuous grain boundary α (GBα) was regarded as a detrimental microstructure for the mechanical properties of dual-phase titanium alloys, therefore, attention has been paid to break off or even eliminate GBα. In this work, Widmannstätten microstructure (LA) with continuous GBα, duplex microstructure (DP) without GBα and hierarchical microstructure (HR) with dot-dash grain boundary α (αGB-d) were prepared by a fine tuning of the heat treatments. Impressively, HR with αGB-d possesses a highest impact toughness, which is 56.3 % and 11.1 % higher than those of LA and DP, respectively. To elucidate the fracture mechanisms of αGB-d, energy controlled Charpy impact tests were carried out by adjusting the impact angle of hammer head, which provides direct evidence of the microstructure evolution during impact deformation. It was found that αGB-d played two main roles during impact deformation: as a weak micro-zone, αGB-d is prone to accumulate deformations and becomes the preferred site for crack initiation, in this case, αGB-d acts as structural element to absorb impact energy; on the other hand, the misorientation between αGB-d and adjacent αp hinders dislocation slip transfer and shortens crack propagation path. Thus, comparing with DP and LA, cracks propagating in HR absorb more energy and lead to less catastrophic fracture. This work develops the understanding of grain boundary α, and the findings are expected to provide new design guidance for the mechanical property improvement of titanium alloys.
KW - Impact toughness
KW - Ti-652 alloy
KW - dot-dash grain boundary α
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217028488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.178988
DO - 10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.178988
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85217028488
SN - 0925-8388
VL - 1017
JO - Journal of Alloys and Compounds
JF - Journal of Alloys and Compounds
M1 - 178988
ER -