TY - JOUR
T1 - Dialectical analysis of amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law of China in 2018
AU - Haiqing, Peng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© St. Petersburg State University, 2021
PY - 2021/7/5
Y1 - 2021/7/5
N2 - The amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law in China in 2018 mainly involves enhancing the system for leniency based on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment, increasing the procedure of fast-track sentencing, improving the convergence norm between the Criminal Procedure Law and the Supervision Law, and adding the procedure for trial in absentia. These improvements and additions have positive implications for the implementation of a criminal policy of leniency and strictness, for realization of the diversion of complex situations and simple situations in the proceedings, for deepening the reform of the state’s supervisory system, for realizing the people’s procuratorate’s effective performance of legal supervision, and power and for effectively punishing crimes of corruption. However, there are limitations in the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2018. In the future, the amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law can adopt both the comprehensive amendment of the National People’s Congress and the partial amendment of its Standing Committee, so as to promote the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in a timely and comprehensive manner. In terms of the amendment’s content, the judicial reform results and coordination between laws should be fully considered. New regulations for the new law should be clear and enforceable. In regard to law implementation, there should be sufficient time for implementation preparation after the promulgation of the new law.
AB - The amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law in China in 2018 mainly involves enhancing the system for leniency based on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment, increasing the procedure of fast-track sentencing, improving the convergence norm between the Criminal Procedure Law and the Supervision Law, and adding the procedure for trial in absentia. These improvements and additions have positive implications for the implementation of a criminal policy of leniency and strictness, for realization of the diversion of complex situations and simple situations in the proceedings, for deepening the reform of the state’s supervisory system, for realizing the people’s procuratorate’s effective performance of legal supervision, and power and for effectively punishing crimes of corruption. However, there are limitations in the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2018. In the future, the amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law can adopt both the comprehensive amendment of the National People’s Congress and the partial amendment of its Standing Committee, so as to promote the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in a timely and comprehensive manner. In terms of the amendment’s content, the judicial reform results and coordination between laws should be fully considered. New regulations for the new law should be clear and enforceable. In regard to law implementation, there should be sufficient time for implementation preparation after the promulgation of the new law.
KW - Amendment
KW - Chinese plea bargaining
KW - Criminal Procedure Law
KW - Justice and effectiveness
KW - State’s supervisory system
KW - Trial in absentia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113821127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21638/spbu14.2021.209
DO - 10.21638/spbu14.2021.209
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85113821127
SN - 2074-1243
VL - 12
SP - 384
EP - 400
JO - Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Pravo
JF - Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Pravo
IS - 2
ER -