TY - JOUR
T1 - Computations of energy release rate under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions
AU - Xiao, Tao
AU - Liao, Ri Dong
AU - Zuo, Zheng Xing
PY - 2009/9
Y1 - 2009/9
N2 - In case of an elastic-plastic fracture mechanics analysis, the determination of the energy release rate distribution is a crucial point. In the present paper, three numerical techniques: the virtual crack closure technique (VCCT), J-integral and energy derivative technique (EDT), are used to compute the energy release rate in a middle-crack tension specimen with the combined isotropic/kinematic hardening model. The results obtained by these methods are compared with each other under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions. Finally, it comes out that the difference of the VCCT method to the J-integral is rather insensitive to load increasing, especially when the traction >40% of yield stress, however, the deviation of the VCCT and J-integral results are within 10%, suggesting that one may use the VCCT for plastic cracked specimen analysis. The computations show that the EDT provides the same values for the monotonic as the J-integral if the plastic deformations are not large, but for high plastic loading the EDT overestimates the fracture energy. For cyclic loading case, VCCT method offers closer results as the elastic analytical results, also suggesting that the whole plastic dissipated energy in the loading process should be integrated. While EDT method gives the smaller results than the J-integral because of the energy dissipated in the unloading phase is considered in the loading process.
AB - In case of an elastic-plastic fracture mechanics analysis, the determination of the energy release rate distribution is a crucial point. In the present paper, three numerical techniques: the virtual crack closure technique (VCCT), J-integral and energy derivative technique (EDT), are used to compute the energy release rate in a middle-crack tension specimen with the combined isotropic/kinematic hardening model. The results obtained by these methods are compared with each other under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions. Finally, it comes out that the difference of the VCCT method to the J-integral is rather insensitive to load increasing, especially when the traction >40% of yield stress, however, the deviation of the VCCT and J-integral results are within 10%, suggesting that one may use the VCCT for plastic cracked specimen analysis. The computations show that the EDT provides the same values for the monotonic as the J-integral if the plastic deformations are not large, but for high plastic loading the EDT overestimates the fracture energy. For cyclic loading case, VCCT method offers closer results as the elastic analytical results, also suggesting that the whole plastic dissipated energy in the loading process should be integrated. While EDT method gives the smaller results than the J-integral because of the energy dissipated in the unloading phase is considered in the loading process.
KW - Energy derivative technique
KW - Energy release rate
KW - Hardening behavior
KW - J-integral
KW - Virtual crack closure technique
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69249212200&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.07.001
DO - 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.07.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:69249212200
SN - 0927-0256
VL - 46
SP - 694
EP - 699
JO - Computational Materials Science
JF - Computational Materials Science
IS - 3
ER -