TY - GEN
T1 - Comparison of two control methods of switched reluctance generator
AU - Ling, Lulu
AU - Dong, Lei
AU - Liao, Xiaozhong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 IEEE.
PY - 2017/7/2
Y1 - 2017/7/2
N2 - This paper presents an analysis of single pulse control method (SPCM) and SPCM adopting freewheeling technique. Based on a single-phase 12/12 SRG with U-cores, performance in terms of output power, efficiency, torque ripple and dc current ripple of switched reluctance generator (SRG) in these two control methods are analyzed and compared. SPCM adopting freewheeling technique is shown to improve the torque ripple and dc current ripple, however cannot enhance the output power and efficiency.
AB - This paper presents an analysis of single pulse control method (SPCM) and SPCM adopting freewheeling technique. Based on a single-phase 12/12 SRG with U-cores, performance in terms of output power, efficiency, torque ripple and dc current ripple of switched reluctance generator (SRG) in these two control methods are analyzed and compared. SPCM adopting freewheeling technique is shown to improve the torque ripple and dc current ripple, however cannot enhance the output power and efficiency.
KW - freewheeling technique
KW - performance
KW - single pulse control method (SPCM)
KW - switched reluctance generator (SRG)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047421720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICIEA.2017.8282947
DO - 10.1109/ICIEA.2017.8282947
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85047421720
T3 - Proceedings of the 2017 12th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, ICIEA 2017
SP - 792
EP - 796
BT - Proceedings of the 2017 12th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, ICIEA 2017
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 12th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, ICIEA 2017
Y2 - 18 June 2017 through 20 June 2017
ER -