TY - JOUR
T1 - An Adaptive Disturbance Rejection Controller for Artificial Pancreas
AU - Cai, Deheng
AU - Liu, Wei
AU - Dassau, Eyal
AU - Doyle, Francis J.
AU - Cai, Xiaoling
AU - Wang, Junzheng
AU - Ji, Linong
AU - Shi, Dawei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Artificial pancreas (AP) systems are designed to automate glucose management for patients with type 1 diabetes. In this work, we propose an adaptive disturbance rejection control approach for AP systems to achieve safe and effective glucose regulation. The controller is built within the framework of active disturbance rejection control, but incorporates safety operation constraints, and glucose- and velocity-dependent parameter adaptation modules for the key control parameters. In silico performance comparison between the proposed controller and an adaptive zone model predictive controller (MPC) (Shi, Dassau, and Doyle III, 2019a) is conducted on the 10-adult cohort of the FDA-accepted UVA/Padova T1DM simulator. For both announced and unannounced meals, the controller achieves comparable glucose regulation performance in terms of mean glucose (134.9 mg/dL vs. 135.4 mg/dL, p < 0.001; 149.7 mg/dL vs. 151.7 mg/dL, p < 0.001, respectively) and percentage time in [70, 180] mg/dL (93.8% vs. 92.4%, p < 0.001; 76.0% vs. 72.4%, p < 0.001, respectively) without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia. The results indicate the feasibility of achieving comparable glucose regulation performance through a non-optimization control law for AP systems.
AB - Artificial pancreas (AP) systems are designed to automate glucose management for patients with type 1 diabetes. In this work, we propose an adaptive disturbance rejection control approach for AP systems to achieve safe and effective glucose regulation. The controller is built within the framework of active disturbance rejection control, but incorporates safety operation constraints, and glucose- and velocity-dependent parameter adaptation modules for the key control parameters. In silico performance comparison between the proposed controller and an adaptive zone model predictive controller (MPC) (Shi, Dassau, and Doyle III, 2019a) is conducted on the 10-adult cohort of the FDA-accepted UVA/Padova T1DM simulator. For both announced and unannounced meals, the controller achieves comparable glucose regulation performance in terms of mean glucose (134.9 mg/dL vs. 135.4 mg/dL, p < 0.001; 149.7 mg/dL vs. 151.7 mg/dL, p < 0.001, respectively) and percentage time in [70, 180] mg/dL (93.8% vs. 92.4%, p < 0.001; 76.0% vs. 72.4%, p < 0.001, respectively) without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia. The results indicate the feasibility of achieving comparable glucose regulation performance through a non-optimization control law for AP systems.
KW - Active disturbance rejection control
KW - Adaptive control
KW - Artificial pancreas
KW - Glucose regulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118386919&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.674
DO - 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.674
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85118386919
SN - 2405-8963
VL - 53
SP - 16372
EP - 16379
JO - IFAC-PapersOnLine
JF - IFAC-PapersOnLine
IS - 2
T2 - 21st IFAC World Congress 2020
Y2 - 12 July 2020 through 17 July 2020
ER -