Worst-case innovation-based integrity attacks with side information on remote state estimation

Ziyang Guo, Dawei Shi*, Karl Henrik Johansson, Ling Shi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we study the worst-case consequence of innovation-based integrity attacks with side information in a remote state estimation scenario where a sensor transmits its measurement to a remote estimator equipped with a false-data detector. If a malicious attacker is not only able to compromise the transmitted data packet but also able to measure the system state itself, the attack strategy can be designed based on the intercepted data, the sensing data, or alternatively the combined information. Surprisingly, we show that launching attacks using the combined information are not always optimal. First, we characterize the stealthiness constraints for different types of attack strategies to avoid being noticed by the false-data detector. Then, we derive the evolution of the remote estimation error covariance in the presence of attacks, based on which the worst-case attack policies are obtained by solving convex optimization problems. Furthermore, the closed-form expressions of the worst-case attacks are obtained for scalar systems and the attack consequences are compared with the existing work to determine which strategy is more critical in deteriorating system performance. Simulation examples are provided to illustrate the analytical results.

Original languageEnglish
Article number8259281
Pages (from-to)48-59
Number of pages12
JournalIEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cyber-physical system (CPS) security
  • integrity attack
  • remote state estimation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Worst-case innovation-based integrity attacks with side information on remote state estimation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this