Value premium in the Chinese stock market: Free lunch or paid lunch?

Yujia Huang, Jiawen Yang, Yongji Zhang*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this article we find that value premium exist throughout our sample period 1998-2008. However, the predictability of Book-to-Market (B/M) ratio appears to be unrelated with financial distress risk. In fact, value stocks are less risky than growth stocks in terms of return volatility and estimated financial distress risk. Further, our results suggest that the factor Value Minus Growth (VMG), which is directly related to value premium, is not a pervasive risk measure compared to the market factor and Small Minus Big (SMB) factor. While the size effect seems to be closely related to distress risk, both size and B/M factors do not appear to be driven by financial distress risk.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)315-324
    Number of pages10
    JournalApplied Financial Economics
    Volume23
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

    Keywords

    • assets mispricing
    • financial distress risk
    • value premium

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Value premium in the Chinese stock market: Free lunch or paid lunch?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this