Abstract
The infinite Post Correspondence Problem (ωPCP) was shown to be undecidable by Ruohonen (1985) in general. Blondel and Canterini [Theory Comput. Syst. 36 (2003) 231-245] showed that ωPCP is undecidable for domain alphabets of size 105, Halava and Harju [RAIRO-Theor. Inf. Appl. 40 (2006) 551-557] showed that ωPCP is undecidable for domain alphabets of size 9. By designing a special coding, we delete a letter from Halava and Harju's construction. So we prove that ωPCP is undecidable for domain alphabets of size 8.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 451-457 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2012 |
Keywords
- Semi-Thue system
- Theory of computation
- Undecidable
- ωPCP
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Undecidability of infinite post correspondence problem for instances of size 8'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
Dong, J., & Liu, Q. (2012). Undecidability of infinite post correspondence problem for instances of size 8. RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications, 46(3), 451-457. https://doi.org/10.1051/ita/2012015