The thermodynamic and cost-benefit-analysis of miniaturized lead-cooled fast reactor with supercritical CO2 power cycle in the commercial market

Ming Jia Li*, Yan Jun Jie, Han Hui Zhu, Guo Jia Qi, Meng Jie Li

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The lead is considered as a more attractive material of coolant than lead/bismuth because of higher availability, lower price and fast neutron spectrum in recent years. In this paper, the thermodynamic analysis and cost-benefit-analysis of miniaturized lead-cooled fast reactor (LFR) composing different power cycles have been investigated to examine the optimization result of the miniaturized system in the commercial market. The study proposes a design of such the miniaturized LFR system for a first step implementation of the technology. First, the typical cycles include the reheating recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle (hereinafter referred to as S-CO2 cycle), the traditional steam Rankine cycle and the helium (He) Brayton cycle. Second, main parameters of thermodynamic analysis and economic analysis are based on the National Standards of Chinese Industry and the realistic financial and cost estimating assumptions in China. Third, the reheating recompression S-CO2 Brayton cycle is the optimal option to the LFR. The main results demonstrate that the thermal efficiency of the reheating recompression S-CO2 Brayton cycle is 43.72%. The efficiency of the LFR generation system comprising reheating recompression S-CO2 Brayton cycle is 41.53%. Both of them are greater than the efficiencies of steam Rankine cycle (38.62%, 36.69%) and He cycle (37%, 35.41%). Finally, the electricity production costs (EPC) of LFR generation system is obtained as $0.0536/(kW·h), which is lower than the average electricity price in China ($0.0632/kW·h). The payback period of the investment is 31.4 years while the lifespan is 40 years. The profit of company undertaking the LFR generation system is $6.3 million. Therefore, it can be found that the reheating recompression S-CO2 Brayton cycle is the primary choice of the LFR system, and its profit for commercialization of the system is beneficial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-150
Number of pages16
JournalProgress in Nuclear Energy
Volume103
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Commercial market
  • Investment analysis
  • Lead-cooled fast reactor
  • Miniaturized system
  • Reheating recompression S-CO Brayton cycle
  • Thermodynamic analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The thermodynamic and cost-benefit-analysis of miniaturized lead-cooled fast reactor with supercritical CO2 power cycle in the commercial market'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this