TY - JOUR
T1 - The determinants of presenteeism
T2 - A comprehensive investigation of stress-related factors at work, health, and individual factors among the aging workforce
AU - Yang, Tianan
AU - Zhu, Mingjing
AU - Xie, Xiyao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Journal of .Occupational Health.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the determinants of presenteeism, taking health and individual factors into account. Methods: A quantitative analysis applying structural equation modelling analysis was conducted on the basis of secondary data from the Health and Retirement Survey (2008 wave), which measured presenteeism and its determinants. Results: Stress-related factors at work (β =-0.35, p < 0.001), individual factors (β =-0.27, p < 0.001), and health (β =0.24, p < 0.001) were significantly related to presenteeism. Individual factors were found to be directly correlated with stress-related factors at work (β =0.22, p < 0.001). Significant indirect effects between stress-related factors at work and presenteeism (Sobel z=-6.61; p < 0.001) and between individual factors and presenteeism (Sobel z=-4.42; p < 0.001), which were mediated by health, were also found. Overall, the final model accounted for 37% (R2=0.37) of the variance in presenteeism. Conclusions: Our study indicates some important and practical guidelines for employers to avoid the burdens of stress-related presenteeism among their employees. These findings could help select target factors in the design and implementation of effective presenteeism interventions in the aging working population.
AB - Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the determinants of presenteeism, taking health and individual factors into account. Methods: A quantitative analysis applying structural equation modelling analysis was conducted on the basis of secondary data from the Health and Retirement Survey (2008 wave), which measured presenteeism and its determinants. Results: Stress-related factors at work (β =-0.35, p < 0.001), individual factors (β =-0.27, p < 0.001), and health (β =0.24, p < 0.001) were significantly related to presenteeism. Individual factors were found to be directly correlated with stress-related factors at work (β =0.22, p < 0.001). Significant indirect effects between stress-related factors at work and presenteeism (Sobel z=-6.61; p < 0.001) and between individual factors and presenteeism (Sobel z=-4.42; p < 0.001), which were mediated by health, were also found. Overall, the final model accounted for 37% (R2=0.37) of the variance in presenteeism. Conclusions: Our study indicates some important and practical guidelines for employers to avoid the burdens of stress-related presenteeism among their employees. These findings could help select target factors in the design and implementation of effective presenteeism interventions in the aging working population.
KW - Discrimination
KW - Health
KW - Personality traits
KW - Presenteeism
KW - Stress-related factors at work
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016924158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1539/JOH.15-0114-OA
DO - 10.1539/JOH.15-0114-OA
M3 - Article
C2 - 26490428
AN - SCOPUS:85016924158
SN - 1341-9145
VL - 58
SP - 25
EP - 35
JO - Journal of Occupational Health
JF - Journal of Occupational Health
IS - 1
ER -