TY - JOUR
T1 - Research on Personalized AEB Strategies Based on Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning
AU - Li, Haotian
AU - Jin, Hui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2000-2011 IEEE.
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - In this paper, a driving style recognition method based on self-supervised contrastive learning was developed. Traditional machine learning models cannot directly accept time series data of variables as inputs, and therefore, artificially constructed statistical variables are required. The driving style recognition model proposed in this paper can directly input the raw time-series data, which can more fully preserve the driving information. On the basis of three driving styles recognition, a style factor model was designed to make the driving style continuous, and the forgetting factor was introduced to synthesize the style factor under the most recent data and the style factor under the historical data. The implementation of personalized AEB strategies involved three steps: First, using the emergency factor as an indicator, the aggressive braking strategy line was obtained statistically. Then, according to the data from calm drivers and moderate drivers, the corresponding encoder-decoder models were established to predict the longitudinal relative distance and longitudinal relative velocity. Finally, based on the aggressive braking strategy line and the encoder-decoder models, the calm braking strategy and the moderate braking strategy were designed. The proposed AEB strategies achieved a higher rate of collision avoidance than the classic Mazda, Honda, and Berkeley strategies. When the risk of collision is eliminated from test samples, on average, compared with the aggressive strategy, the calm strategy is 1.05 s earlier, while the moderate strategy is 0.58 s earlier. Such results are more in line with the expectations of different drivers, and the personalized AEB system can improve driver acceptance.
AB - In this paper, a driving style recognition method based on self-supervised contrastive learning was developed. Traditional machine learning models cannot directly accept time series data of variables as inputs, and therefore, artificially constructed statistical variables are required. The driving style recognition model proposed in this paper can directly input the raw time-series data, which can more fully preserve the driving information. On the basis of three driving styles recognition, a style factor model was designed to make the driving style continuous, and the forgetting factor was introduced to synthesize the style factor under the most recent data and the style factor under the historical data. The implementation of personalized AEB strategies involved three steps: First, using the emergency factor as an indicator, the aggressive braking strategy line was obtained statistically. Then, according to the data from calm drivers and moderate drivers, the corresponding encoder-decoder models were established to predict the longitudinal relative distance and longitudinal relative velocity. Finally, based on the aggressive braking strategy line and the encoder-decoder models, the calm braking strategy and the moderate braking strategy were designed. The proposed AEB strategies achieved a higher rate of collision avoidance than the classic Mazda, Honda, and Berkeley strategies. When the risk of collision is eliminated from test samples, on average, compared with the aggressive strategy, the calm strategy is 1.05 s earlier, while the moderate strategy is 0.58 s earlier. Such results are more in line with the expectations of different drivers, and the personalized AEB system can improve driver acceptance.
KW - AEB strategy
KW - Driving style
KW - encoder-decoder model
KW - self-supervised contrastive learning model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174837927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TITS.2023.3317361
DO - 10.1109/TITS.2023.3317361
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85174837927
SN - 1524-9050
VL - 25
SP - 1303
EP - 1316
JO - IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
JF - IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
IS - 2
ER -