TY - JOUR
T1 - Reassessing China's virtual water trade with a global value chain framework
T2 - Participation, inequality and multi-scenario analysis
AU - Wei, Ziyi
AU - Deng, Zhongci
AU - Dawood, Muhammad
AU - Yu, Yajuan
AU - Wang, Zhen
AU - Huang, Kai
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - With the rise of global value chain (GVC), traditional accounting methods for virtual water (VW) trade have failed to reflect the inherent VW flow generated by the production of intermediate goods in shared production processes. Here, we reassess China's VW consumption in 2020 based on a new GVC framework, and propose the concept of VW consumption embodied in forward and backward GVC activities (VWF/VWB). We clarify China's role in GVC activities and reveal VWF/VWB inequalities under multiple scenarios. Our results show that the maximum share of VWF and VWB reaches 64.4% and 86.1%, respectively, far exceeding the traditional trade share. China's VWB primarily sources from developing countries in Asia, while VWF primarily serves the United States. VWF/VWB inequalities are exacerbated by China's GVC activities and exhibit considerable variation under multiple scenarios. Our findings provide new insights into reconciling China's GVC participation and narrowing regional disparities in VW consumption.
AB - With the rise of global value chain (GVC), traditional accounting methods for virtual water (VW) trade have failed to reflect the inherent VW flow generated by the production of intermediate goods in shared production processes. Here, we reassess China's VW consumption in 2020 based on a new GVC framework, and propose the concept of VW consumption embodied in forward and backward GVC activities (VWF/VWB). We clarify China's role in GVC activities and reveal VWF/VWB inequalities under multiple scenarios. Our results show that the maximum share of VWF and VWB reaches 64.4% and 86.1%, respectively, far exceeding the traditional trade share. China's VWB primarily sources from developing countries in Asia, while VWF primarily serves the United States. VWF/VWB inequalities are exacerbated by China's GVC activities and exhibit considerable variation under multiple scenarios. Our findings provide new insights into reconciling China's GVC participation and narrowing regional disparities in VW consumption.
KW - Global value chain
KW - Hypothetical extraction method
KW - Inequality
KW - Input-output analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203632151&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107904
DO - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107904
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85203632151
SN - 0921-3449
VL - 212
JO - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
JF - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
M1 - 107904
ER -