TY - JOUR
T1 - Pressure-Angle Polars Obtaining Flow Field of Rotating Detonation
AU - Jiang, Chunxue
AU - Wang, Yuhui
AU - Zhang, Guoqing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Rotating detonation engines have been studied experimentally and numerically due to a higher thermal efficiency in theory. Numerical simulations of the flow field inside the engine cost more since the flow is unsteady and contains shock waves, detonation waves, and contact surfaces. Thus, a two-dimensional theoretical study with the method of pressure behind a shock wave or a rarefaction wave as a function of deflection angle of flow was carried out to predict the flow field and reduce the cost. Numerical simulations with a premixed inviscid model were also carried out to verify the theoretical results. The flow field at an equivalence ratio of 0.8 has a curved contact surface, whereas it has a plane contact surface at equivalence ratios of 0.9–1.2 because the RDW is stronger and more stable. Comparisons between the theoretical and numerical results show the theoretical method can be used to obtain a rough flow field inside the RDE, including the pressure and deflection angle of flow behind the shock wave and rarefaction wave. Most of the errors between the numerical and theoretical results are less than 10%.
AB - Rotating detonation engines have been studied experimentally and numerically due to a higher thermal efficiency in theory. Numerical simulations of the flow field inside the engine cost more since the flow is unsteady and contains shock waves, detonation waves, and contact surfaces. Thus, a two-dimensional theoretical study with the method of pressure behind a shock wave or a rarefaction wave as a function of deflection angle of flow was carried out to predict the flow field and reduce the cost. Numerical simulations with a premixed inviscid model were also carried out to verify the theoretical results. The flow field at an equivalence ratio of 0.8 has a curved contact surface, whereas it has a plane contact surface at equivalence ratios of 0.9–1.2 because the RDW is stronger and more stable. Comparisons between the theoretical and numerical results show the theoretical method can be used to obtain a rough flow field inside the RDE, including the pressure and deflection angle of flow behind the shock wave and rarefaction wave. Most of the errors between the numerical and theoretical results are less than 10%.
KW - Rotating detonation engines
KW - flow field
KW - numerical simulations
KW - pressure-angle polars
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198501597&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00102202.2024.2378493
DO - 10.1080/00102202.2024.2378493
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85198501597
SN - 0010-2202
VL - 196
SP - 2020
EP - 2037
JO - Combustion Science and Technology
JF - Combustion Science and Technology
IS - 13
ER -