Power and heat co-generation by micro-tubular flame fuel cell on a porous media burner

Yuqing Wang, Hongyu Zeng, Yixiang Shi*, Tianyu Cao, Ningsheng Cai, Xiaofeng Ye, Shaorong Wang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)
Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 43
  • Captures
    • Readers: 47
see details

Abstract

A flame fuel cell setup is designed and built based on a micro-tubular solid oxide fuel cell and a two-layer porous media burner. The stable operation limits of the burner are obtained by adjusting the inlet gas velocity and the equivalence ratio. Methane fuel-rich flames are stabilized inside the burner from the equivalence ratio of 1.4-1.8. The effects of the equivalence ratio and the gas velocity on the temperature distribution inside the burner and the combustion products are studied. Using a burner efficiency based on lower heating values, up to 41.1% of methane was converted to H2 and CO at the equivalence ratio of 1.7. The maximum mole fraction of H2 and CO reached 9.32% and 8.18% respectively. Flame fuel cell experiments are carried out with different equivalence ratios. The tubular SOFC is directly heated up and reduced by the fuel-rich flame. The maximum power generated by the flame fuel cell reached 0.55 W at the equivalence ratio of 1.7 and the inlet gas velocity of 0.15 m/s.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-123
Number of pages7
JournalEnergy
Volume109
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Flame fuel cell
  • Hydrogen
  • Partial oxidation
  • Porous media combustion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Power and heat co-generation by micro-tubular flame fuel cell on a porous media burner'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Wang, Y., Zeng, H., Shi, Y., Cao, T., Cai, N., Ye, X., & Wang, S. (2016). Power and heat co-generation by micro-tubular flame fuel cell on a porous media burner. Energy, 109, 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.095