TY - JOUR
T1 - Overcharge-to-thermal-runaway behavior and safety assessment of commercial lithium-ion cells with different cathode materials
T2 - A comparison study
AU - Wang, Zhenpo
AU - Yuan, Jing
AU - Zhu, Xiaoqing
AU - Wang, Hsin
AU - Huang, Lvwei
AU - Wang, Yituo
AU - Xu, Shiqi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Science Press
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - In this paper, overcharge behaviors and thermal runaway (TR) features of large format lithium-ion (Li-ion) cells with different cathode materials (LiFePO4 (LFP), Li[Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3]O2 (NCM111), Li[Ni0.6Co0.2Mn0.2]O2 (NCM622) and Li[Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1]O2 (NCM811)) were investigated. The results showed that, under the same overcharge condition, the TR of LFP Li-ion cell occurred earlier compared with the NCM Li-ion cells, indicating its poor overcharge tolerance and high TR risk. However, when TR occurred, LFP Li-ion cell exhibited lower maximum temperature and mild TR response. All NCM Li-ion cells caught fire or exploded during TR, while the LFP Li-ion cell only released a large amount of smoke without fire. According to the overcharge behaviors and TR features, a safety assessment score system was proposed to evaluate the safety of the cells. In short, NCM Li-ion cells have better performance in energy density and overcharge tolerance (or low TR risk), while LFP Li-ion cell showed less severe response to overcharging (or less TR hazards). For NCM Li-ion cells, as the ratio of nickel in cathode material increases, the thermal stability of the cathode materials becomes poorer, and the TR hazards increase. Such a comparison study on large format Li-ion cells with different cathode materials can provide deeper insights into the overcharge behaviors and TR features, and provide guidance for engineers to reasonably choose battery materials in automotive applications.
AB - In this paper, overcharge behaviors and thermal runaway (TR) features of large format lithium-ion (Li-ion) cells with different cathode materials (LiFePO4 (LFP), Li[Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3]O2 (NCM111), Li[Ni0.6Co0.2Mn0.2]O2 (NCM622) and Li[Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1]O2 (NCM811)) were investigated. The results showed that, under the same overcharge condition, the TR of LFP Li-ion cell occurred earlier compared with the NCM Li-ion cells, indicating its poor overcharge tolerance and high TR risk. However, when TR occurred, LFP Li-ion cell exhibited lower maximum temperature and mild TR response. All NCM Li-ion cells caught fire or exploded during TR, while the LFP Li-ion cell only released a large amount of smoke without fire. According to the overcharge behaviors and TR features, a safety assessment score system was proposed to evaluate the safety of the cells. In short, NCM Li-ion cells have better performance in energy density and overcharge tolerance (or low TR risk), while LFP Li-ion cell showed less severe response to overcharging (or less TR hazards). For NCM Li-ion cells, as the ratio of nickel in cathode material increases, the thermal stability of the cathode materials becomes poorer, and the TR hazards increase. Such a comparison study on large format Li-ion cells with different cathode materials can provide deeper insights into the overcharge behaviors and TR features, and provide guidance for engineers to reasonably choose battery materials in automotive applications.
KW - Cathode materials
KW - Lithium-ion battery
KW - Overcharge
KW - Overcharge tolerance
KW - Safety assessment
KW - Thermal runaway
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088957858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.07.028
DO - 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.07.028
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85088957858
SN - 2095-4956
VL - 55
SP - 484
EP - 498
JO - Journal of Energy Chemistry
JF - Journal of Energy Chemistry
ER -