On the Nonexistence of Rate-One Generalized Complex Orthogonal Designs

Xue Bin Liang*, Xiang Gen Xia

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Orthogonal space-time block coding proposed recently by Alamouti and Tarokh, Jafarkhani, and Calderbank is a promising scheme for information transmission over Rayleigh-fading channels using multiple transmit antennas due to its favorable characteristics of having full transmit diversity and a decoupled maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding algorithm. Tarokh, Jafarkhani, and Calderbank extended the theory of classical orthogonal designs to the theory of generalized, real, or complex, linear processing orthogonal designs and then applied the theory of generalized orthogonal designs to construct space-time block codes (STBCs) with the maximum possible diversity order while having a simple decoding algorithm for any given number of transmit and receive antennas. It has been known that the STBCs constructed in this way can achieve the maximum possible rate of one for every number of transmit antennas using any arbitrary real constellation and for two transmit antennas using any arbitrary complex constellation. Contrary to this, in this correspondence we prove that there does not exist rate-one STBC from generalized complex linear processing orthogonal designs for more than two transmit antennas using any arbitrary complex constellation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2984-2989
Number of pages6
JournalIEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Volume49
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Alamouti scheme
  • Complex orthogonal designs
  • Full rate
  • Generalized complex orthogonal designs
  • Hurwitz-Radon theory
  • Orthogonal designs
  • Space-time block codes (STBCs)
  • Transmit diversity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the Nonexistence of Rate-One Generalized Complex Orthogonal Designs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this