TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiple-arc cylinder under flow
T2 - Vortex-induced vibration and energy harvesting
AU - Zhang, Rui
AU - Huang, Lianzhong
AU - Wang, Kai
AU - Ma, Ranqi
AU - Ruan, Zhang
AU - Lan, Tian
AU - Li, Boyang
AU - Zhang, Baoshou
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - The shape of a cylindrical cross-section affects the vibrational performance. The vortex-induced vibration (VIV) phenomena of multiple-arc cylinders were numerically investigated to assess their impact on hydrodynamic energy harvesting and potential vibration suppression across a flow velocity range of 0.2 m/s to 1.4 m/s (1.767 × 1045). The study involves five types of multiple-arc cylinders: 4-arc, 8-arc, 16-arc, 24-arc, and circular cylinders. The accuracy of the numerical method was validated through comparison with experimental data. Specifically, increasing the number of arcs generally enhances overall energy conversion efficiency. Then, the VIV response and energy conversion results of the 24-arc cylinder are similar to those of the circular cylinder with maximum efficiency. Notably, the 4-arc cylinder achieves a global maximum amplitude of 0.074 m (A∗ = 0.83) and a power output of 4.4 W with the new P + T mode, making it the most effective configuration for flow velocities between 0.7 and 0.9 m/s. For vibration suppression of multiple-arc cylinders, the appropriate arc structure effectively reduces amplitudes. The small vortices generated by the arc structures disrupt the separation of normal vortices from the boundary layer, leading to approximately a 50 % reduction in amplitude responses for 8-arc and 16-arc cylinders.
AB - The shape of a cylindrical cross-section affects the vibrational performance. The vortex-induced vibration (VIV) phenomena of multiple-arc cylinders were numerically investigated to assess their impact on hydrodynamic energy harvesting and potential vibration suppression across a flow velocity range of 0.2 m/s to 1.4 m/s (1.767 × 1045). The study involves five types of multiple-arc cylinders: 4-arc, 8-arc, 16-arc, 24-arc, and circular cylinders. The accuracy of the numerical method was validated through comparison with experimental data. Specifically, increasing the number of arcs generally enhances overall energy conversion efficiency. Then, the VIV response and energy conversion results of the 24-arc cylinder are similar to those of the circular cylinder with maximum efficiency. Notably, the 4-arc cylinder achieves a global maximum amplitude of 0.074 m (A∗ = 0.83) and a power output of 4.4 W with the new P + T mode, making it the most effective configuration for flow velocities between 0.7 and 0.9 m/s. For vibration suppression of multiple-arc cylinders, the appropriate arc structure effectively reduces amplitudes. The small vortices generated by the arc structures disrupt the separation of normal vortices from the boundary layer, leading to approximately a 50 % reduction in amplitude responses for 8-arc and 16-arc cylinders.
KW - Hydrodynamic energy harvesting
KW - Multiple-arc cylinder
KW - Numerical simulations
KW - Vortex-induced vibration (VIV)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205293283&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.marstruc.2024.103699
DO - 10.1016/j.marstruc.2024.103699
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85205293283
SN - 0951-8339
VL - 99
JO - Marine Structures
JF - Marine Structures
M1 - 103699
ER -