TY - JOUR
T1 - Linking personality traits to behavior-based intervention
T2 - Empirical evidence from Hangzhou, China
AU - Shen, Meng
AU - Li, Xiang
AU - Song, Xiangnan
AU - Lu, Yujie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Eco-feedback has been considered as a promising approach to facilitating residential energy-saving behavior recently. However, the mechanism that how personality traits affect effectiveness of eco-feedback with different information delivery method is still unknown. To fill the knowledge gap, an energy conservation field experiment was conducted in residential communities in Hangzhou, China. Three information delivery methods, including stickers, WeChat, and face-to-face consultation, and two intervention contents including eco-feedback and energy-saving tips, were adopted to intervene subject residents separately. The findings suggest that the treatment effect was primarily determined by personality traits, demographics and situational factors. In addition, stickers exert a positive intervention effect during the treatment period, while WeChat and consultation do not reduce energy consumption until late stage of the experiment. In terms of personality traits, the treatment effects of stickers and consultations are more effective than WeChat for open-minded people. Neurotic residents tend to conserve more energy when they only receive energy-saving tips regardless of the information delivery method. Consequently, providing residents with customized eco-feedback according to personality traits can better improve the treatment effect. The policy implications of this research could provide insights into energy demand-side management and promote energy-saving interventions in residential sector.
AB - Eco-feedback has been considered as a promising approach to facilitating residential energy-saving behavior recently. However, the mechanism that how personality traits affect effectiveness of eco-feedback with different information delivery method is still unknown. To fill the knowledge gap, an energy conservation field experiment was conducted in residential communities in Hangzhou, China. Three information delivery methods, including stickers, WeChat, and face-to-face consultation, and two intervention contents including eco-feedback and energy-saving tips, were adopted to intervene subject residents separately. The findings suggest that the treatment effect was primarily determined by personality traits, demographics and situational factors. In addition, stickers exert a positive intervention effect during the treatment period, while WeChat and consultation do not reduce energy consumption until late stage of the experiment. In terms of personality traits, the treatment effects of stickers and consultations are more effective than WeChat for open-minded people. Neurotic residents tend to conserve more energy when they only receive energy-saving tips regardless of the information delivery method. Consequently, providing residents with customized eco-feedback according to personality traits can better improve the treatment effect. The policy implications of this research could provide insights into energy demand-side management and promote energy-saving interventions in residential sector.
KW - Eco-feedback
KW - Energy intervention
KW - Energy-saving behavior
KW - Information delivery method
KW - Personality traits
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129015650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106796
DO - 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106796
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85129015650
SN - 0195-9255
VL - 95
JO - Environmental Impact Assessment Review
JF - Environmental Impact Assessment Review
M1 - 106796
ER -