TY - JOUR
T1 - Is biomass energy really clean? An environmental life-cycle perspective on biomass-based electricity generation in China
AU - Xu, Changqing
AU - Hong, Jinglan
AU - Chen, Jianmei
AU - Han, Xiaofei
AU - Lin, Chen
AU - Li, Xiangzhi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - A bottom-up approach combined with national and provincial statistical data was used to evaluate the potential environmental effects of electricity generation scenarios based on five mature biomasses in China. Coal-based electricity generation technology was used as control. Uncertainty analysis was conducted to confirm and add credibility to this study. The electricity generation capacities of municipal solid waste, sewage sludge, and corn straw account for approximately 0.86%, 0.085%, and 8.18%, respectively, of electricity generated in China in 2012. The estimated national environmental burden caused by biomass-based electricity generation was mainly observed in eastern China, which can be attributed to the relatively high population density and economic levels of this region. For each biomass-based scenario, the key factors that contribute to the overall environmental burden include direct emissions of nitrogen oxides, phosphorus, mercury, and particulate matter. In addition, carbon dioxide pollution generated from methane incineration, road transport, and electricity consumption play a dominant role in the overall environmental burden. The environmental benefits of biomass mainly vary depending on the technologies applied and their electricity generation efficiency. Compared with the corn straw scenario, coal-based electricity generation technology yields strong environmental benefits in most key categories with the exception of climate change and human toxicity. Accordingly, biomass is not unconditionally cleaner than fossil fuel. The utilization and popularization of biomass-based electricity generation technologies must be systematically and scientifically evaluated to avoid secondary pollution generation and pollutant transformation.
AB - A bottom-up approach combined with national and provincial statistical data was used to evaluate the potential environmental effects of electricity generation scenarios based on five mature biomasses in China. Coal-based electricity generation technology was used as control. Uncertainty analysis was conducted to confirm and add credibility to this study. The electricity generation capacities of municipal solid waste, sewage sludge, and corn straw account for approximately 0.86%, 0.085%, and 8.18%, respectively, of electricity generated in China in 2012. The estimated national environmental burden caused by biomass-based electricity generation was mainly observed in eastern China, which can be attributed to the relatively high population density and economic levels of this region. For each biomass-based scenario, the key factors that contribute to the overall environmental burden include direct emissions of nitrogen oxides, phosphorus, mercury, and particulate matter. In addition, carbon dioxide pollution generated from methane incineration, road transport, and electricity consumption play a dominant role in the overall environmental burden. The environmental benefits of biomass mainly vary depending on the technologies applied and their electricity generation efficiency. Compared with the corn straw scenario, coal-based electricity generation technology yields strong environmental benefits in most key categories with the exception of climate change and human toxicity. Accordingly, biomass is not unconditionally cleaner than fossil fuel. The utilization and popularization of biomass-based electricity generation technologies must be systematically and scientifically evaluated to avoid secondary pollution generation and pollutant transformation.
KW - Biomass-based electricity
KW - Municipal solid waste
KW - Sewage sludge
KW - Straw
KW - Uncertainty analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988909477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.181
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.181
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84988909477
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 133
SP - 767
EP - 776
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
ER -