Influence of phase stability on postshock mechanical properties and microstructure evolution in Ti-17 alloy

Zheng Li, Yu Ren*, Ziyue Zhang, Zhihua Nie, Xianjin Ning, Chengwen Tan, Pengwan Chen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There has been a growing surge of interest in examining the shock response of titanium alloys, owing to their considerable potential for military applications. The present study aims to reveal the influence of phase stability on the shock-induced mechanical response and substructure evolution of a metastable β titanium alloy, namely, Ti-17. This investigation included extensive work, such as plate impact tests, quasi-static reloading compression tests, and electron microscope analyses. The microstructural evaluations following the shock-wave loading unveil planar slip as the prevailing deformation mechanism in Ti-17 with a bimodal microstructure with stable α and β phases. However, when the shock stress exceeds 10 GPa, the activation of { 10 1 ¯ 1 } α nano-sized twins was observed, leading to improved reloading ductility. This implies a novel strategy to achieve excellent strength-plasticity compatibility in titanium alloys through appropriate shock-wave loading. Conversely, in Ti-17 with an equiaxed β microstructure, the metastability of the β phase leads to the activation of shock-induced α″ martensite, shock-induced ω, and planar slip. Two distinct forms of interaction involving the α″ laths, i.e., shear and truncation, were also observed. Phase stability greatly influences substructure evolution, which ultimately controls the reloading mechanical properties of the postshock Ti-17 alloy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number145101
JournalJournal of Applied Physics
Volume136
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Oct 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of phase stability on postshock mechanical properties and microstructure evolution in Ti-17 alloy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this