How to design a targeted agricultural subsidy system: Efficiency or equity?

Rong Gang Cong*, Mark Brady

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)
Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 26
    • Policy Citations: 1
  • Captures
    • Readers: 60
see details

Abstract

In this paper we appraise current agricultural subsidy policy in the EU. Several sources of its inefficiency are identified: it is inefficient for supporting farmers' incomes or guaranteeing food security, and irrational transfer payments decoupled from actual performance that may be negative for environmental protection, social cohesion, etc. Based on a simplified economic model, we prove that there is "reverse redistribution" in the current tax-subsidy system, which cannot be avoided. To find a possible way to distribute subsidies more efficiently and equitably, several alternative subsidy systems (the pure loan, the harvest tax and the income contingent loan) are presented and examined.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere41225
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume7
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Aug 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to design a targeted agricultural subsidy system: Efficiency or equity?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Cong, R. G., & Brady, M. (2012). How to design a targeted agricultural subsidy system: Efficiency or equity? PLoS ONE, 7(8), Article e41225. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041225