Higher-order polysulfides induced thermal runaway for 1.0 Ah lithium sulfur pouch cells

Feng Ni Jiang, Shi Jie Yang, Zi Xian Chen, He Liu, Hong Yuan, Lei Liu, Jia Qi Huang, Xin Bing Cheng*, Qiang Zhang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Comprehensive analyses on thermal runaway mechanisms are critically vital to achieve the safe lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries. The reactions between dissolved higher-order polysulfides and Li metal were found to be the origins for the thermal runaway of 1.0 Ah cycled Li–S pouch cells. 16-cycle pouch cell indicates high safety, heating from 30 to 300 °C without thermal runaway, while 16-cycle pouch cell with additional electrolyte undergoes severe thermal runaway at 147.9 °C, demonstrating the key roles of the electrolyte on the thermal safety of batteries. On the contrary, thermal runaway does not occur for 45-cycle pouch cell despite the addition of the electrolyte. It is found that the higher-order polysulfides (Li2Sx ≥ 6) are discovered in 16-cycle electrolyte while the sulfur species in 45-cycle electrolyte are Li2Sx ≤ 4. In addition, strong exothermic reactions are discovered between cycled Li and dissolved higher-order polysulfide (Li2S6 and Li2S8) at 153.0 °C, driving the thermal runaway of cycled Li–S pouch cells. This work uncovers the potential safety risks of Li–S batteries and negative roles of the polysulfide shuttle for Li–S batteries from the safety view.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-17
Number of pages8
JournalParticuology
Volume79
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2023

Keywords

  • Lithium–sulfur batteries
  • Polysulfide shuttle
  • Polysulfides
  • Pouch cell
  • Thermal runaway

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Higher-order polysulfides induced thermal runaway for 1.0 Ah lithium sulfur pouch cells'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this