TY - JOUR
T1 - Four decades of China’s agricultural extension reform and its impact on agents’ time allocation
AU - Cai, Jinyang
AU - Jia, Yao
AU - Hu, Ruifa
AU - Zhang, Chao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - The Chinese Government has initiated a series of agricultural reforms since the 1970s to encourage agents to provide more services to farmers. In 2006, a new round of agricultural reforms was extended nationwide; however, the effectiveness of these reforms has not been examined. Based on a comparison of survey data sets before and after the reforms, we found that overall they significantly increased the time agents spend on agricultural extension services, although their effectiveness differs among three major components of the reforms. While the financial assurance reform had little impact on agents’ time allocation, the administrative reform actually reduced the time allocation to agricultural extension. However, we found strong evidence that the ‘three rights’ management reform (comprising the rights of personnel, financial and asset management) successfully increased agents’ time allocation to agricultural extension services. We also found that institutional incentives and the Government’s investment did not increase the time agents spent on agricultural extension. The lack of incentives is a problem that needs to be addressed in future reforms. We found that professional agents spent more time providing extension services than their non-professional counterparts. We suggest that local Governments should avoid recruiting non-professional agents into agricultural extension stations.
AB - The Chinese Government has initiated a series of agricultural reforms since the 1970s to encourage agents to provide more services to farmers. In 2006, a new round of agricultural reforms was extended nationwide; however, the effectiveness of these reforms has not been examined. Based on a comparison of survey data sets before and after the reforms, we found that overall they significantly increased the time agents spend on agricultural extension services, although their effectiveness differs among three major components of the reforms. While the financial assurance reform had little impact on agents’ time allocation, the administrative reform actually reduced the time allocation to agricultural extension. However, we found strong evidence that the ‘three rights’ management reform (comprising the rights of personnel, financial and asset management) successfully increased agents’ time allocation to agricultural extension services. We also found that institutional incentives and the Government’s investment did not increase the time agents spent on agricultural extension. The lack of incentives is a problem that needs to be addressed in future reforms. We found that professional agents spent more time providing extension services than their non-professional counterparts. We suggest that local Governments should avoid recruiting non-professional agents into agricultural extension stations.
KW - China
KW - administrative reform
KW - agent
KW - agricultural extension
KW - ‘three rights’ reform
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077801591&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-8489.12361
DO - 10.1111/1467-8489.12361
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077801591
SN - 1364-985X
VL - 64
SP - 104
EP - 125
JO - Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
JF - Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
IS - 1
ER -