Evaluation of damage process of a coating by using nonlinear ultrasonic method

Chunguang Xu*, Lei He, Shiyuan Zhou, Dingguo Xiao, Pengzhi Ma

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During the service or external loading of the surface coating, the damage accumulation may develop in the coating or at the interface between the substrate and the coating, but it is difficult to measure directly in the early stage, so the acoustic nonlinear parameters are used as the early damage index of the coating. In this paper, the nonlinear wave motion equation is solved by the perturbation method and the new relationship between the relative ratio of second-order parameter and third-order parameter was derived. The nonlinear ultrasonic testing system is used to detect received signals during tensile testing of for the specimen with Al2O3 coatings. It is found that when the stress is less than 260 MPa, the appearance of the coating has no obvious change, but the nonlinear coefficients measured by the experiment increase with the increase of the tensile stress. By comparing the curves of nonlinear coefficients and stress respectively, the fluctuation of curves the second-order nonlinear coefficient A2 and the relative nonlinear coefficient β' to stress is relatively small, and close to the linear relationship with the tensile stress, which indicates that the two parameters of the specimen with Al2O3 coatings are more sensitive to the bonding conditions, and can be used as an evaluation method to track the coating damage.

Original languageEnglish
Article number440
JournalCoatings
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021

Keywords

  • Acoustic nonlinearity
  • Material degradation
  • Secondorder and third-order nonlinear coefficient
  • Simplified nonlinear parameter

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of damage process of a coating by using nonlinear ultrasonic method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this