TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles
AU - Guo, Dongdong
AU - Ge, Yunshan
AU - Wang, Xin
AU - Liu, Haixu
AU - Su, Sheng
AU - Li, Chunbo
AU - Tao, Tinghong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed.
AB - Gasoline particulate filter (GPF) is a cost-effective solution to particle number emissions from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Filtration efficiency, as a key parameter of GPF, was usually assessed at chassis level over regulatory drive cycles. However, the promulgation of real driving emission (RDE) requirements in the EU and Chinese regulations necessitates evaluations based on non-legislative cycles to guarantee the on-road emissions are compliant to regulatory requirements. In this research, two aggressive drive cycles, RTS95 at 23degC and modified RDE at 0degC, were complemented to the WLTC to evaluate the filtration efficiency of a catalyzed GPF (cGPF) in fresh conditions to obtain the so-called “worst-case” filtration efficiency. In the WLTC, RTS95, and simulated RDE tests, the filtration efficiency of the test cGPF was 51.1%, 41.3%, and 85.1% respectively. In the simulated RDE test, the test cGPF filtrated solid particles with a diameter above 23 nm and 10 nm at a similar efficiency. Increased filtration efficiency with heavier soot load could offset the relatively low filtration efficiency in cold-start and warm-up durations, hence the filtration efficiency for a clean cGPF showed higher sensitivity to cycle length over driving dynamics and testing temperature. In acceleration events with cGPF mounted, the particle diameter where number concentration peaked decreased as the engine warmed up. In deceleration events, bimodal and trimodal particle number size distributions with much lower concentrations were observed.
KW - Drive cycle
KW - Filtration efficiency
KW - Gasoline particulate filter (GPF)
KW - Real driving emission (RDE)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129302328&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717
DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134717
M3 - Article
C2 - 35487355
AN - SCOPUS:85129302328
SN - 0045-6535
VL - 301
JO - Chemosphere
JF - Chemosphere
M1 - 134717
ER -