Abstract
The units of experimental data [1] (cited as Ref. [38] in original paper) and the srim data in Fig. 10 of our paper are incorrect. We provide below the corrected version of Fig. 10; the caption from the original article is also included but it has not changed. It can be seen from the figure that our calculated stopping cross section (SCS) underestimates the experimental SCS [1] and the srim data beyond the measured stopping maximum. However, these changes do not affect the conclusion of the paper. (Figure Presented).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 069905 |
Journal | Physical Review A |
Volume | 102 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 29 Dec 2020 |