TY - JOUR
T1 - Equivalent Mueller matrix method for 3-D axial error analysis in 2-D SoP measurement
AU - Wang, Luo
AU - Zhang, Haiyang
AU - Jin, Fahong
AU - Zhao, Changming
AU - He, Jianwei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2024 Optica Publishing Group.
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - We explored an equivalent Mueller matrix method for analyzing 3-D axial errors in 2-D polarization state measurements for the first time, to the best of our knowledge. The method treats 2-D devices with 3-D errors as a closed system, within which the transformation of a 3-D polarization field is described using a 3×3 coherency matrix and generalized Jones matrix (GJM). The equivalent 4×4Mueller matrix of the component is numerically evaluated fromthe 2-D polarization field information at the input and output ports. Furthermore, our research has identified that any 3-D axial error within the polarization state analyzer (PSA) can be classified into two categories: axial alignment error (AAE) and wave-vector alignment error (WAE). For the latter case,we have introduced a concept of equal weight variance of a wave-vector as an alternative to the spiral sampling method to estimate the upper-bound of relative state of polarization (SoP) error. A simulation result shows that for the ideal bi-plate PSA, the upperbound remains below 3% when the deviation value is less than 17.7 deg. The equivalent Mueller matrix method can be applied to analyze the 3-D errors in an arbitrary sort of PSA, and the description of 3-D transformation in this paper is simpler than a 9×9 generalizedMueller matrix and nine-element generalized Stokes vector, which has potential value in the research of vector beam generation.
AB - We explored an equivalent Mueller matrix method for analyzing 3-D axial errors in 2-D polarization state measurements for the first time, to the best of our knowledge. The method treats 2-D devices with 3-D errors as a closed system, within which the transformation of a 3-D polarization field is described using a 3×3 coherency matrix and generalized Jones matrix (GJM). The equivalent 4×4Mueller matrix of the component is numerically evaluated fromthe 2-D polarization field information at the input and output ports. Furthermore, our research has identified that any 3-D axial error within the polarization state analyzer (PSA) can be classified into two categories: axial alignment error (AAE) and wave-vector alignment error (WAE). For the latter case,we have introduced a concept of equal weight variance of a wave-vector as an alternative to the spiral sampling method to estimate the upper-bound of relative state of polarization (SoP) error. A simulation result shows that for the ideal bi-plate PSA, the upperbound remains below 3% when the deviation value is less than 17.7 deg. The equivalent Mueller matrix method can be applied to analyze the 3-D errors in an arbitrary sort of PSA, and the description of 3-D transformation in this paper is simpler than a 9×9 generalizedMueller matrix and nine-element generalized Stokes vector, which has potential value in the research of vector beam generation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187231321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1364/JOSAB.514740
DO - 10.1364/JOSAB.514740
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85187231321
SN - 0740-3224
VL - 41
SP - 589
EP - 596
JO - Journal of the Optical Society of America B: Optical Physics
JF - Journal of the Optical Society of America B: Optical Physics
IS - 3
ER -