TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental and economic benefit comparison between coupled grey-green infrastructure system and traditional grey one through a life cycle perspective
AU - Xu, Changqing
AU - Liu, Zijing
AU - Chen, Zhengxia
AU - Zhu, Yifei
AU - Yin, Dingkun
AU - Leng, Linyuan
AU - Jia, Haifeng
AU - Zhang, Xiang
AU - Xia, Jun
AU - Fu, Guangtao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Green infrastructure is increasingly incorporated into the existing urban drainage system, i.e., grey infrastructure, for stormwater management in the context of rapid urbanization and climate change. Whether the coupled green–grey system can yield additional benefits requires quantification of environmental and economic performance. This study proposes a cost-combined life cycle assessment method to evaluate the environmental and economic benefits of coupled grey and green infrastructure system. Compared to traditional assessment methods, this method introduces internal (e.g., material cost, energy cost) and external (i.e., human health, ecological restoration, and pollutants emission) economic costs to conduct assessment. This research identifies key factors (i.e., categories, processes, and substances) of a coupled grey and green infrastructure system in a typical residential area in China. The coupled system is shown to generate higher environmental impacts and economic costs than grey system in the construction stage. The operation stage of coupled system can observe significant environmental and economic benefits. The payback time of related environmental impacts (except for non-carcinogens) and total economic costs is 4 years for the current case study. Noteworthy, a currently existing subsidy scheme would allow to reduce the payback time of total economic costs from 3.78 to 1.18 years. This study provides concrete evidence in support of urban stormwater management.
AB - Green infrastructure is increasingly incorporated into the existing urban drainage system, i.e., grey infrastructure, for stormwater management in the context of rapid urbanization and climate change. Whether the coupled green–grey system can yield additional benefits requires quantification of environmental and economic performance. This study proposes a cost-combined life cycle assessment method to evaluate the environmental and economic benefits of coupled grey and green infrastructure system. Compared to traditional assessment methods, this method introduces internal (e.g., material cost, energy cost) and external (i.e., human health, ecological restoration, and pollutants emission) economic costs to conduct assessment. This research identifies key factors (i.e., categories, processes, and substances) of a coupled grey and green infrastructure system in a typical residential area in China. The coupled system is shown to generate higher environmental impacts and economic costs than grey system in the construction stage. The operation stage of coupled system can observe significant environmental and economic benefits. The payback time of related environmental impacts (except for non-carcinogens) and total economic costs is 4 years for the current case study. Noteworthy, a currently existing subsidy scheme would allow to reduce the payback time of total economic costs from 3.78 to 1.18 years. This study provides concrete evidence in support of urban stormwater management.
KW - Coupled grey and green system
KW - Economic benefit
KW - Environmental impact
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Urban runoff control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111004683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105804
DO - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105804
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85111004683
SN - 0921-3449
VL - 174
JO - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
JF - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
M1 - 105804
ER -