Energy-saving potential prediction models for large-scale building: A state-of-the-art review

Xiu'e Yang, Shuli Liu*, Yuliang Zou, Wenjie Ji, Qunli Zhang, Abdullahi Ahmed, Xiaojing Han, Yongliang Shen, Shaoliang Zhang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Energy-saving potential prediction models play a major role in developing retrofit scheme. Reliable estimation and quantification of energy saving of retrofit measures for these models is essential, since it is often used for guiding political decision-makers. The aim of this paper is to provide up-to-date approaches of predicting energy-saving effect for building retrofit in large-scale, including data-driven, physics-based, and hybrid approaches, while throwing light on workflow and key factors in developing models. The review focuses on pointing out pivotal aspects that are not considered in current models of predicting energy-saving effect for building retrofit in large-scale. It is concluded that the validation of proposed models mainly focuses on an aggregated level, which makes it ignore performance gap differences between buildings. The models exist the problem of prebound- and rebound effects due to uncertainty factor. Occupant's willingness to retrofit is ignored in all three categories of models, which can lead to the prediction result deviate from the actual situation in a certain extent. This paper promotes the development of models for predicting energy-saving potential for large-scale buildings, and help to formulate appropriate strategies for the retrofit of existing buildings.

Original languageEnglish
Article number111992
JournalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Volume156
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022

Keywords

  • Building retrofit
  • Data-driven
  • Energy-saving
  • Physical-based
  • Prediction models

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Energy-saving potential prediction models for large-scale building: A state-of-the-art review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this