TY - JOUR
T1 - Electro-peroxone degradation of diethyl phthalate
T2 - Cathode selection, operational parameters, and degradation mechanisms
AU - Hou, Meifang
AU - Chu, Yaofei
AU - Li, Xiang
AU - Wang, Huijiao
AU - Yao, Weikun
AU - Yu, Gang
AU - Murayama, Seiichi
AU - Wang, Yujue
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2016/12/5
Y1 - 2016/12/5
N2 - This study compares the degradation of diethyl phthalate (DEP) by the electro-peroxone (E-peroxone) process with three different carbon-based cathodes, namely, carbon-polytetrafluorethylene (carbon-PTFE), carbon felt, and reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC). Results show that the three cathodes had different electrocatalytic activity for converting sparged O2 to H2O2, which increased in order of carbon felt, RVC, and carbon-PTFE. The in-situ generated H2O2 then reacts with sparged O3 to yield [rad]OH, which can in turn oxidize ozone-refractory DEP toward complete mineralization. In general, satisfactory total organic carbon removal yields (76.4–91.8%) could be obtained after 60 min of the E-peroxone treatment with the three carbon-based cathodes, and the highest yield was obtained with the carbon-PTFE cathode due to its highest activity for H2O2 generation. In addition, the carbon-PTFE and carbon felt cathodes exhibited excellent stability over six cycles of the E-peroxone treatment of DEP solutions. Based on the intermediates (e.g., monoethyl phthalate, phthalic acid, phenolics, and carboxylic acids) identified by HPLC-UV, plausible reaction pathways were proposed for DEP mineralization by the E-peroxone process. The results of this study indicate that carbon-based cathodes generally have good electrocatalytic activity and stability for application in extended E-peroxone operations to effectively remove phthalates from water.
AB - This study compares the degradation of diethyl phthalate (DEP) by the electro-peroxone (E-peroxone) process with three different carbon-based cathodes, namely, carbon-polytetrafluorethylene (carbon-PTFE), carbon felt, and reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC). Results show that the three cathodes had different electrocatalytic activity for converting sparged O2 to H2O2, which increased in order of carbon felt, RVC, and carbon-PTFE. The in-situ generated H2O2 then reacts with sparged O3 to yield [rad]OH, which can in turn oxidize ozone-refractory DEP toward complete mineralization. In general, satisfactory total organic carbon removal yields (76.4–91.8%) could be obtained after 60 min of the E-peroxone treatment with the three carbon-based cathodes, and the highest yield was obtained with the carbon-PTFE cathode due to its highest activity for H2O2 generation. In addition, the carbon-PTFE and carbon felt cathodes exhibited excellent stability over six cycles of the E-peroxone treatment of DEP solutions. Based on the intermediates (e.g., monoethyl phthalate, phthalic acid, phenolics, and carboxylic acids) identified by HPLC-UV, plausible reaction pathways were proposed for DEP mineralization by the E-peroxone process. The results of this study indicate that carbon-based cathodes generally have good electrocatalytic activity and stability for application in extended E-peroxone operations to effectively remove phthalates from water.
KW - Electrocatalytic ozonation
KW - Electrode
KW - Hydrogen peroxide
KW - Ozone
KW - Phthalates
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954306675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.054
DO - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.054
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84954306675
SN - 0304-3894
VL - 319
SP - 61
EP - 68
JO - Journal of Hazardous Materials
JF - Journal of Hazardous Materials
ER -